期刊文献+

药物淋巴细胞刺激试验对于诊断抗结核药物所致超敏反应的价值及意义 被引量:5

The value of drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test for the diagnosis of anti-tuberculous drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价药物淋巴细胞刺激试验(DLST)对确定因何种抗结核药物所致超敏反应的诊断价值。方法2010年8月至2012年7月期间,上海市肺科医院收治的114例抗结核药物治疗后发生超敏反应的初治肺结核患者作为超敏反应组,同期人院的96例抗结核药物治疗后未发生超敏反应的初治肺结核患者作为对照组,各抽取外周静脉血10ml进行DLST,并与“金标准”药物激发试验(DPT)结果相比较,计算DLST的敏感度、特异度、假阳性率和假阴性率。结果114例超敏反应组共发生了127例次超敏反应,其中药物性皮疹37例次,药物性肝损伤65例次,药物热25例次。DLST对诊断4种一线抗结核药物(INH、RFP、EMB、PZA)引起超敏反应的敏感度分别为64.5N(20/31)、48.3N(28/58)、54.2N(13/24)和31.6N(6/19),特异度分别为93.3%(167/179)、94.7%(144/152)、97.3N(181/186)和98.4N(188/191),假阳性率分别为6.7%(12/179)、5.3%(8/152)、2.7%(5/186)和1.68(3/191),假阴性率分别为35.5%(11/31)、51.7%(30/58)、45.aN(11/24)和68.4N(13/19)。结论DLST对于诊断因何种抗结核药物所致超敏反应具有较高的特异度与较低的敏感度,对于指导临床有一定的意义。 Objective To evaluate the value of drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) for the dia- gnosis of anti-tuberculosis (TB) drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction. Methods One hundred and fourteen pa- tients with first treatment pulmonary tuberculosis who had adverse drug reactions were served as case group. Nine- ty-six patients without adverse drug reactions were served as control group. After the DLST was completed, the sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate and false negative rate were compared with "gold standard" drug provoca tion test (DPT) for each reaction event and each drug. Results Of 114 patients in case group, a total of 127 times of anti-TB drug-associated adverse reactions occurred, including 37 cases of drug rash, 65 cases of drug-induced liver injury, and 25 cases of drug-associated fever. The sensitivities of DLST in the diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions induced by isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RFP), ethambutol (EMB), and pyrazinamide (PZA) were 64. 5% (20/31), 48. 3% (28/58), 54. 2% (13/24) and 31. 6% (6/19), respectively. Their specificities were 93. 3% (167/179), 94. 7% (144/152), 97.3% (181/186) and 98. 4% (188/191), respectively. Their false-positive rates were 6.7% (12/179), 5.3% (8/152), 2. 7%(5/186) and 1.6% (3/191), respectively. Their false-negative rates were 35.5% (11/31), 51.7% (30/58), 45.8% (11/24) and 68. 4% (13/19), respectively. Conclusion DLST have high specificity and limited sensitivity in the diagnosis of anti-TB drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction, and is helpful for the clinicians to predict the causative drugs.
出处 《中国防痨杂志》 CAS 2014年第12期1062-1066,共5页 Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis
基金 上海市卫生局青年科研基金(20124Y024)
关键词 结核 肺/药物疗法 抗结核药 药物过敏 淋巴细胞活化 Tuberculosis, pulmonary/drug therapy Antitubercular agents Drug hypersensitivity Lymphocyte activation
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Ikegame S,Wakamatsu K, Fujita M, et al. A case of isoniazidin- duced liver injury diagnosed by use of the DLST, and success ful reintroduction of isoniazid for pleural tuberculosis. J Infect Chemother, 2011, 17(4) :530-533. 被引量:1
  • 2Matsuno O, Takenaka R, Ando M,et al. Amoxicillin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia with granulomatous reaction: discrepan- cy between drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test findings and the provocation drug test. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol, 2007, 3(2):70-72. 被引量:1
  • 3Kawakami T, Tanaka A, Negoro S, et al. Liver injury in duced by levothyroxine in a patient with primary hypothyroi- dism. Intern Med, 2007, 46(14) : 1105-1108. 被引量:1
  • 4Suzuki Y, Miwa S, Shirai M, et al. Drug lymphocyte stimula- tion test in the diagnosis of adverse reactions to antituberculo-sis drugs. Chest, 2008, 134(5) : 1027 1032. 被引量:1
  • 5唐神结主编..临床结核病学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:709.
  • 6邓国防,雷建平,邓群,吴于青.抗结核药物致超敏反应32例临床分析[J].中国防痨杂志,2014,36(1):21-24. 被引量:13
  • 7Martin M, Wurpts G, Ott H, et al. In vitro detection and characterization of drug hypersensitivity using flow cytometry. Allergy,2010, 65(1) :32-39. 被引量:1
  • 8Lopez S, Torres MJ, Rodriguez-Pena R, et al. Lymphocyte proliferation response in patients with delayed hypersensitivity reactions to heparins. Br J Dermatol,2009, 160(2):259-265. 被引量:1
  • 9Blumberg HM, Burman WJ, Chaisson RE, et al. American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/ Infectious Diseases Society of America: treatment of tubercu- losis. Am J Respir Crit Care Meal,2003, 167(4): 603-662. 被引量:1
  • 10Riedl MA, Casillas AM. Adverse drug reactions: types and treatment options. Am Fam Physician, 2003, 68 ( 9 ): 1781-1790. 被引量:1

二级参考文献12

  • 1张南生,陈瑞杰,张秀华.利福平不良反应的文献分析[J].中国临床药学杂志,2005,14(5):312-315. 被引量:31
  • 2刘桦,张佳丽.药物过敏反应的免疫学机制研究进展[J].中国现代应用药学,2006,23(4):284-286. 被引量:21
  • 3Lee WM. Acetaminophen and the U.S. Acute Liver Failure Study Group: lowering the risks of hepatic failure. Hepatology, 2004, 40: 6-9. 被引量:1
  • 4川一.DDW-Jcr004ワクツヨケ物性肝障害断の核心.肝,2005,46:85.92. 被引量:1
  • 5Danan G. Causality assessment of drug-induced liver injury. J Hepatol, 1988, 7: 132-136. 被引量:1
  • 6Danan G, Benichou C. Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs-l. A novel method based on the conclusions of international consensus meetings: application to drug-induced liver injuries. J Clin Epidemiol, 1993, 46: 1323-1330. 被引量:1
  • 7Watkins PB. Biomarkers for the diagnosis and management of drug- induced liver injury. Semin Liver Dis, 29: 393-399. 被引量:1
  • 8川一,恩地森一,高森雪.DDW-J20049ワクツヨケ药物性肝障害诊断基准の提案.肝,2005,46:85-90. 被引量:1
  • 9渡真彰.物性肝障害にすげゐリソバ球刺激の断的と断指の肝,2001,42:448-453. 被引量:1
  • 10谢莉,高微微,卜建玲,马玙.702例抗结核药物所致不良反应分析[J].结核病与胸部肿瘤,2008(4):257-261. 被引量:43

共引文献16

同被引文献54

  • 1雷建平.重新审视结核病免疫治疗研究的方向和方法[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2010,4(7):908-915. 被引量:13
  • 2廖爱华,王燕,张玲.人类B细胞转化为抗体分泌浆细胞的体外研究[J].中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,2007,27(7):647-650. 被引量:2
  • 3Blumberg HM, Burman WJ, Chaisson RE, et al. American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/ Infectious Diseases Society of America: treatment of tubercu- losis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2003,167(4) . 603-662. 被引量:1
  • 4Rezakovic S, Pastar Z, Kostovic K. Cutaneous adverse drug reactions caused by antituberculosis drugs. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets, 2014,13 (4) . 241-248. 被引量:1
  • 5McNeil BD, Pundir P, Meeker S, et al. Identification of a mast-cell-specific receptor crucial for pseudo allergic drug reac- tions. Nature, 2015,519(7542):237-241. 被引量:1
  • 6Taylor PA, Lees CJ, Blazar BR. The infusion of ex vivo acti- vated and expanded CIN ( + ) CD25 ( + ) immune regulatory cells inhibits graft-versus host disease lethality. Blood, 2002, 99(10) .- 3493-3499. 被引量:1
  • 7Chiacehio T, Casetti R, Butera O, et al. Characterization of regulatory T cells identified as CD4 (+ ) CD25 (high) CD39 (+) in patients with active tuberculosis. Clin Exp Immunol, 2009, 156(3):463-470. 被引量:1
  • 8Mahan CS, Thomas JJ, Boom WH, et al. CD4+ CD25(high) Foxp3- regulatory T cells downregulate human Vdelta2 + T-lymphocyte function triggered by anti-CD3 or phosphoanti- gen. Immunology, 2009, 127(3):398-407. 被引量:1
  • 9Porebski G, Gsehwend-Zawodniak A, Piehler WJ. In vitro diagnosis of T cell mediated drug allergy. Clin Exp Allergy, 2011,41(4) :461-470. 被引量:1
  • 10周汉良,卞如濂.抗药抗体与抗受体抗体(综述).浙江医科大学学报,1985,14(1):31-35. 被引量:1

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部