期刊文献+

基于全寿命周期的桥梁结构抗震性能评价与设计方法研究进展 被引量:27

Research Progress on Life-cycle Based Bridge Structural Seismic Performance Evaluation and Design Method
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了促进桥梁结构全寿命抗震设计研究在中国的发展,详细论述并总结了基于全寿命周期的桥梁结构抗震性能评价与设计方法在国内外的研究进展,同时建立了其研究体系的基本框架。首先介绍了钢筋混凝土桥梁结构在其全寿命周期内遭受以氯离子腐蚀作用为主的环境作用分析模型的研究成果,在此基础上着重介绍了以桥梁结构地震易损性分析方法为代表的抗震性能评价方法与地震损失成本评估方法的研究进展,最后论述了基于全寿命成本分析的桥梁结构抗震优化设计方法研究现状。研究结果表明:基于全寿命周期的抗震性能评价和设计方法能够合理地解决传统抗震设计方法中未考虑结构抗震性能退化的问题,对于桥梁抗震工程领域的发展具有重要意义。 To improve the development of life-cycle based bridge structural seismic design method in China, the research progress in life-cycle based bridge structural seismic performance evaluation and design method was summarized and the research system framework was set up. First of all, the researches on analytical models concerning the environmental effect, especially the chloride ions corrosion effect, for the reinforced concrete bridge structures during their life cycles were summarized. Moreover, the bridge structural seismic performance evaluation methods, represented by the seismic fragility analysis method, as well as the earthquake damage loss assessment methods were introduced specifically. Finally, the research status of life-cycle cost analysis based bridge structural seismic optimum design method was discussed. The results indicate that the neglect of the seismic performance degradation in the traditional seismic design method can be well considered through the life-cycle based seismic performance evaluation and design method, which is of great significance for the development of the bridge structural seismic engineering.
作者 李宏男 李超
出处 《中国公路学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第10期32-45,共14页 China Journal of Highway and Transport
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划("九七三"计划)项目(2011CB013605) 国家自然科学基金重大研究计划项目(90815026) 国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目(51121005)
关键词 桥梁工程 结构抗震 综述 抗震性能评价 全寿命周期成本分析 bridge engineering structural seismic review seismic performance evaluation life cycle cost analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献70

  • 1ASCE. Report Card for America's Infrastructure[R]. Reston : ASCE, 2009. 被引量:1
  • 2高小旺,鲍霭斌.地震作用的概率模型及其统计参数[J].地震工程与工程震动,1985,5(1):13-22. 被引量:1
  • 3CORNELL C A. Engineering Seismic Risk Analysis[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1968,58(5) :1583-1606. 被引量:1
  • 4LIU Y. Modeling the Time-to-corrosion Cracking of the Cover Concrete in Chloride Contaminated Rein- forced Concrete Structures[D]. Blacksburg.. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,1996. 被引量:1
  • 5林迟..基于结构全寿命设计需求的环境作用与结构性能退化研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学,2010:
  • 6BASOZ N I, KIREMIDJIAN A S, KING S A, et al. Statistical Analysis of Bridge Damage Data from the 1994 Northridge, CA, Earthquake [J ]. Earthquake Spectra, 1999,15(1) :25-53. 被引量:1
  • 7SHINOZUKA M, FENG M Q, LEE J, et al. Statisti- cal Analysis of Fragility Curves[J]. Journal of Engi- neering Mechanics, 2000,126 (12) : 1224-1231. 被引量:1
  • 8SIMON J, BRACCI J M, GARDONI P. Seismic Re- sponse and Fragility of Deteriorated Reinforced Con- crete Bridges[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2010,136(10) :1273- 1281. 被引量:1
  • 9NIELSON B G. Analytical Fragility Curves for High- way Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones[D]. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2005. 被引量:1
  • 10ALIPOUR A, SHAFEI B, SHINOZUKA M. Perform- ance Evaluation of Deteriorating Highway Bridges Located in High Seismic Areas[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2011,16(5) :597-611. 被引量:1

二级参考文献72

共引文献2004

同被引文献254

引证文献27

二级引证文献230

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部