期刊文献+

美国征收补偿的公平市场价值标准及对我国的启示 被引量:13

The Fair Market Value Standard in the Compensation of Eminent Domain in the United States and Implications for China
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国财产征收中的公正补偿具体体现为公平市场价值标准。被征收财产的公平市场价值是一种虚拟状态下的市场交易价格,需要通过各种评估技术手段予以确定,并以财产的最高最优使用为基础。依据公平市场价值标准确定的补偿是不完全赔偿也是非个性化赔偿,经过美国一个多世纪的司法实践却被证明是最为经济有效的补偿标准。我国征收补偿制度的改革应当借鉴美国公平市场价值标准的经验,剥离附着于征收补偿的社会保障功能,建立以被征收财产价值为核心的补偿制度,确立公平市场价值标准和最高最优使用规则。 The just compensation of eminent domain in the United States is measured by the Fair Market Value(FMV) standard.The FMV of the property taken is a fictitious market transaction price,which should be calculated through a variety of assessment techniques,and based on the highest and best use of the property taken.Although FMV standard is characterized by incomplete and non-personalized compensation,it has been proven to be the most economic and effective compensation standard in eminent domain by American judicial practice.Thus,it is suggested that China should detach the social security function,which is always attached to,from the compensation in eminent domain,base the compensation on the value of the property taken,and then set up the FMV standard and the highest and best use rule.
作者 宋志红
出处 《法学家》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期161-175,180,共15页 The Jurist
基金 中国国家留学基金委的资助
关键词 征收 补偿 公平市场价值 Eminent Domain Compensation Fair Market Value(FMV)
  • 相关文献

参考文献55

  • 1张千帆.“公正补偿”与征收权的宪法限制[J].法学研究,2005,27(2):25-37. 被引量:115
  • 2邹爱华.美国土地征收法的新发展及其对我国的启示[J].现代法学,2013,35(4):150-162. 被引量:19
  • 3Sidney Z. Searles, "Highest and Best Use. The Keystone of Valuation in Eminent Domain", 45 New York State Bar Journal (1973). 被引量:1
  • 4Donald T. Morrison, "How to Determine Highest and Best Use", 16ALA-ABA Course Materials Journal (1991 - 1992). 被引量:1
  • 5Thomas W. Merrill, "Incomplete Compensation For Takings", 11 New York University Environmental Law Journal (2002 - 2003). 被引量:1
  • 6Christopher Serkin, "The Meaning of Value. Assessing Just Compensation For Regulatory Takings", 99 Northwest Uni- versity Law Review (2004 -2005). 被引量:1
  • 7Jeffrey T. Powell, "The Psychological Cost of Eminent Domain Takings And Just Compensation", 30 Law & Psychology Review (2006). 被引量:1
  • 8Benjamin A. Householder, "Kelo Compensation. The Future of Economic Development Takings", 82 Chicago-Kent Col- lege of Law Review (2009). 被引量:1
  • 9Jeffrey T. Powell, "The Psychological Cost Of Eminent Domain Takings And Just Compensation", 30 Law & Psychology Review (2006), p. 216. 被引量:1
  • 10Christopher Serkin, "The Meaning of Value. Assessing Just Compensation For Regulatory Takings", 99 Northwest University Law Re- view (2004 -2005), p. 683. 被引量:1

二级参考文献166

同被引文献177

引证文献13

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部