摘要
学术史意义上的"照着说"与"接着说",是期待后学在领悟先哲在给定论域所达到的高度(峰值)之同时,不妨追问其相应的限度(边界)。这落到《谈艺录》对黄遵宪与王国维的诗学抑扬一案,也就呈示钱钟书的审美眼光暨文化视野,比梁启超更经得起证伪。就清末学界诗坛而言,能真正让西学义谛(而非西洋制度名物之皮毛)水乳交融于旧体诗的代表人物,委实惟有王国维,而不是梁所推崇的黄遵宪。文学史界若至今未能"照着说"出钱在1948年的这一卓识,未免有遗珠之憾。至于为何留日不到一年的王国维对西学义谛的细深体悟,远非出使欧美近廿年的黄遵宪所能及?这个本应由钱钟书提出且回答、却终究未提出与回答的关键问题,客观上是为后学对先哲的"接着说"腾出了空间。
In the study of academic history,while'loyally retelling'requires scholars of later generations to understand the climax reached by predecessors in certain field,'creatively saying something more'means to question its limits. Such practice could be found in QIAN Zhongshu's evaluation of the poetry of HUANG Zun-xian and WANG Guo-wei in his On the Art of Poetry( Tanyi Lu),which demonstrates that QIAN goes beyond LIANG Qi-chao in aesthetic judgement and cultural perspective. In the poetic circle in the late Qing Dynasty,it was only WANG Guo-wei,rather than HUANG Zun-xian praised highly by LIANG Qi-chao,who was capable of blending the essence of Western learning( instead of superficial opinions concerning Western institutions and material things) into classical poetry in perfect harmony. It is a pity that no scholar of literature history has 'loyally retold'the insightful view QIAN presented in 1948. However,why could WANG Guowei,who studied in Japan for less than one year,have a much deeper understand of the essence of Western learning than HUANG Zun-xian,who had been frequently sent to Europe and the U. S. on diplomatic missions for nearly 20 years? This key question,which should have been put forward and answered by QIAN,leaves space for scholars of young generations to 'creatively say something more'.
出处
《华东师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第6期8-26,149,共19页
Journal of East China Normal University（Humanities and Social Sciences）
关键词
钱钟书
《谈艺录》
《人境庐诗草》
《静庵诗稿》
“照着说”
“接着说”
诗界维新
QIAN Zhong-shu,On the Art of Poetry,Poems of Renjinglu Villa,Poems of Jing'an,'Loyally Retelling','Creatively Saying Something More'
