期刊文献+

基于DSmT的DEMATEL改进新方法 被引量:2

New improved DEMATEL method based on DSmT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 原始DEMATEL方法及其改进方法,一方面存在因正规化影响矩阵的无穷次幂可能并不收敛而导致方法在某些情况下失效的问题,另一方面也存在因语言标度之间并不相互独立而不能使用Dempster规则对专家推断信息进行直接融合的问题。为了解决上述问题,以Lee和Tzeng提出的改进DEMATEL方法为研究对象,结合语言评估标度和证据理论中的基本信度分配函数构建了具有柔性表达优势的专家推断信息提取机理,通过引入DSmT组合规则提出了能够对所有专家推断信息进行有效集成的融合机理,并在此基础上给出了DEMATEL改进新方法的具体步骤,应用一个模拟案例分析了提出的方法更具科学性和普适性。 There exist two problems in original and improved DEMATEL methods. One is methods may fail under some circumstances for the infinite power of a normalized relation matrix may not converge, and the other is the Dempster rules cannot be used to make direct fusion of experts’inferences due to the independence of language scales. To solve the above two problems, the experts’inferences extraction mechanism with the advantage of soft expression is constructed based on language evaluation scales and the basic belief distribution function by taking the DEMATEL improvement method proposed by Lee and Tzeng as the research subject. By introducing DSmT combination rule, the fusion mechanism is suggested which can be used to make effective integration of all experts’inferences, based on which, the procedures of the new method for improvement of DEMATEL are suggested. The analysis of a simulation case is made to prove the pro-posed method is more of science and universality.
作者 杜元伟 杨娜
出处 《计算机工程与应用》 CSCD 2014年第21期68-73,共6页 Computer Engineering and Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.71261011 No.71462022) 云南省应用基础研究计划项目(No.2011FZ021 No.2013FB030) 云南省教育厅重点项目(No.2012Z103) 云南省哲学社会科学创新团队建设项目资助(No.2014cx05)
关键词 决策试行与评价实验室(DEMATEL)方法 语言评估标度 基本信度分配 DSmT组合规则 三角模糊数 Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory(DEMATEL) method language assessment scales basicprobability assignment DSmT combination rule triangular fuzzy number
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Liou J J H,Yen L, Tzeng G H.Building an effective safety management system for airlines[J].Journal of Air Transport Management, 2008,14 ( 1 ) : 20-26. 被引量:1
  • 2Liou J J H,Tzeng G H.A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment[J].Expert Systems with Applications, 2008,34 ( 1 ) : 205-2 13. 被引量:1
  • 3Liou J J H.Developing an integrated model for the se- lection of strategic alliance partners in the airline industry [J].Knowledge-Based Systems, 2012,28 : 59-67. 被引量:1
  • 4胡伟,程幼明.DEMATEL的改进及其在供应链失效分析中的应用[J].统计与决策,2013,29(6):83-86. 被引量:7
  • 5Wu Weiwen, Lee Yuting.Developing global managers' com- petencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method[J].Expert Sys- tems with Applications, 2007,32(2) : 499-507. 被引量:1
  • 6Buyukozkan G, Ozturkcan D.An integrated analysis approach for six sigma project selection[J].Expert Systems with Applications, 2010,32 ( 8 ) : 5835 -5847. 被引量:1
  • 7李亚群,段万春,孙永河,杜元伟.基于证据理论的群组DEMATEL改进方法[J].计算机工程与应用,2013,49(20):9-14. 被引量:5
  • 8Lee H S, Tzeng G H, Yeih Weichung, et al.Revised DEMATEL: resolving the infeasibility of DEMATEL[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013,37 (10) : 1-12. 被引量:1
  • 9Tzeng Gwo-Hshiung, Chiang Cheng-Hsin,Li Chung-Wei. Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2007,32 (4) : 1028-1044. 被引量:1
  • 10徐泽水.基于语言标度中术语指标的多属性群决策法[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(1):84-88. 被引量:66

二级参考文献55

  • 1王福刚,曾兵,杨杰,韩东波,傅琦.基于集值统计的项目评审模型及其应用[J].科技与管理,2006,8(3):47-49. 被引量:5
  • 2周宇峰,魏法杰.基于模糊判断矩阵信息确定专家权重的方法[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(3):71-75. 被引量:39
  • 3周宇峰,魏法杰.一种综合评价中确定专家权重的方法[J].工业工程,2006,9(5):23-27. 被引量:22
  • 4Ramanathan, R. , Ganesh, L. S.. Group preference ag- gregation methods employed in AHP.. An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages [J]. European Journal of operational Research, 1994, 79:249--265. 被引量:1
  • 5Xu, Z. S. , Cai, X.O.. Nonlinear optimization models for multiple attribute group decision making with intu- itionistic fuzzy information [J] International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2010,25 : 489 -- 513. 被引量:1
  • 6Xu, Z. S.. Consistency of interval fuzzy preference rela- tions in group decision making [J]. Applied Soft Compu- ting, 2011,11 ; 3898-- 3909. 被引量:1
  • 7Xu, Z.S.. Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relations [J]. Information Sciences, 2008,178 : 452 - 467. 被引量:1
  • 8Zadeh, L. A.. Fuzzy sets [J]. Information and Control, 1965,8:338--353. 被引量:1
  • 9Zadeh, I.. A.. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning [J]. Informa- tion Sciences,1975,8(3) :199-249.. 被引量:1
  • 10Kahneman, D. , Tversky, A.. Prospect theory: An a- nalysis of decision under risk [J]. Economica, 1979,47 (2) :263--291. 被引量:1

共引文献88

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部