摘要
在我国《物权法》确立区分原则之后,债权意思主义已为我国物权变动模式所摒弃,但物权形式主义与债权形式主义仍相持不下并最终形成了两难处境的局面。这种现象的出现根本上是由持不同主张的学者迥异的学术背景和思维方式所致,而通过实践论辩层面上的分析,以荷兰为代表符合经验的债权形式主义模式较之囿于体系思维的物权形式主义模式更应成为我国物权变动模式的选择。
As Property Law of PRC establishes the principle of distinction, personal right intentionalism has been abandoned by Chinese transfer mode of property; then there is a dilemma whether to follow personal right externalism or real right externalism. This phenomenon fundamentally is caused by different academic backgrounds and different ways of thinking of the scholars with different opinions. By analyzing process based on the platform of practical argumentation, personal right externalism presented by Netherlands which is in line with the experience rather than real right externalism which is confined to system thinking should be our choice of transfer mode of property in China.
出处
《大连理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2014年第3期80-84,共5页
Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词
物权变动模式
两难处境
实践论辩
处分权
transfer mode of property
dilemma
practical argumentation
transfer right
