期刊文献+

计量法学的学科发展史研究——兼论我国法学定量研究的着力点 被引量:13

Research on the Evolutional History of Jurimetrics——With Additional Study on the Point of China's Quantitative Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在实证研究的理论、思维和方法技术发展的影响下,作为学科的计量法学应运而生,其生长历程经历了萌芽、发展和分野三个阶段。它在萌芽阶段的内容主要是符号逻辑的运用、法律现象数据库的建立和运用以及法官行为和判决预测。计量法学的形成阶段主要是判决预测和制度评价;其以数据建模为方式,对各种法律现象进行实证分析的方法也得以确立。在发展阶段中,计量法学的判决预测论和数据论证领域有了新的研究视角和方法。中国目前学界和实务界都缺乏定量研究,而计量法学对立法、司法和数据库的建立三个方面的发展都能起到重要的作用。 Under the influence of the theory, thinking mode and the development of the method and technique of demonstrative study, Measure Law as an independent discipline originates and can be divided into three stages: germination, development, separating. The main content of the germination stage is calculation of logic of sign, the establishment and calculation of the data of legal phenomenon and the conduct of the judge and the prediction of the sentence. The development state is about the prediction of the sentence and the evaluation of the system and it becomes a discipline in the sense of methodology. At the state of separating from traditional law, the data demonstration field succeeds in separation and there is new development in the prediction of the conduct of the judge.Chinese academic and practical circle lack quantitative study and measure law plays important role in prediction of sentence, evaluation of system and data demonstration.
作者 屈茂辉 匡凯
机构地区 湖南大学法学院
出处 《求是学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期98-106,6,共9页 Seeking Truth
基金 湖南省软科学项目"法学中的数理计量方法及其运用研究" 项目编号:2008ZK3132 湖南省研究生科研创新项目"法的科学性解释" 项目编号:CX2012B150
关键词 计量法学 法官行为预测 制度评价 数据论证 Jurimetrics prediction of the conduct of the judge evaluation of system data demonstration
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1汉斯·采泽尔著..用数字证明 法律和诉讼中的实证方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:307.
  • 2Hans W Baade(ed).Jurimetrics.New York and London.Basic Books Inc,1963. 被引量:1
  • 3Richard A.Posner.“What Do Judges and Justices Maximize? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does)”,in Supreme Court Economic Review,1993,Vol.3. 被引量:1
  • 4Nicholas L.Georgakopoulos.“The Impact of Quantitative Argument in Legal Discourse”,http.//papers.ssrn.com/so13/papers.cfm?abstract_id=288391. 被引量:1
  • 5Nicole L.Mott,Valerie P.Hans,Lindsay Simpson,“What's Half a Lung Worth? Civil Jurors' Accounts of Theist Award Decision Making”,in Law and Human Behavior,2000,Vol.24. 被引量:1
  • 6Joseph B.Kadane,George G.Woodworth.“Hierarchical Models for Employment Decisions”,in Journal of Business and Economic Statistics,2004,Vol.22. 被引量:1
  • 7Charles N.W.Keckler.“The Hazards of Precedent.A Parameterization of Legal Chang”,in Mississippi Law Journal,2010,Vol.80. 被引量:1
  • 8Stacia Haynie.“Judicial Decision.Making and the Use of Panels in the South African Appellate Division.1950-1990”,in South African Journal of Political Studies,2002,Vol.29. 被引量:1
  • 9Bochereau L.Bourcier D,Bourgine P,“Extracting Legal knowledge by Means of a Multilayer Neural Network Application to Municipal Jurisprudence”,Presented in proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law,New York,1991. 被引量:1
  • 10Eldridge William,Dennis Sally.“The Computer as a Tool for Legal Research”,in Law and Contemporary Problems,1963,Vol.28. 被引量:1

二级参考文献54

共引文献221

同被引文献347

引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部