摘要
在法治国家(地区),沉默权和律师帮助权是讯问前最主要的告知内容,如果侦查机关未告知这些权利,则所获供述有可能落入非法供述排除的范围。在讯问前未告知权利与非法供述排除规则的关系上,法治国家(地区)形成了原则加例外模式和裁量排除模式。我国《刑事诉讼法》虽有讯问前告知权利的规定,但告知内容单薄,且未确立程序违法所获供述排除规则。作为理想的改革措施,我国应借鉴法治国家(地区)有关讯问前权利告知制度,建立完整的讯问前权利告知规则;通过对现行立法和司法解释相关规定的进一步挖掘,也可以在不突破现行法律框架的情况下一定程度上弥补我国讯问前权利告知规则的缺陷。
In the countries（districts） under the rule of law, there are the most important informed contents of the right of silence and right to counsel before interrogation. If the investigation organs don＇t inform the rights, the confessions would be exclusion. In the relation between not non-informed informed rights and illegal confession exclusion, there are two models of the principle plus exception and discretion in the countries（districts） under the rule of law. There are rules about informed rights before interrogation in our the criminal procedural law, but informed contents are thin and not established the confession exclusionary through illegal procedural. As the ideal reform measures, we should learn the informed rights systems from the countries（districts） under the rule of law. In the conditions of not breaking through the existing legat framework, the defects of the informed rights before interrogation can be remedied through to a certain extent through exploiting the relevant provisions of the current legislation and judicial interpretation.
出处
《华北电力大学学报（社会科学版）》
2014年第4期63-67,共5页
Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences)
关键词
讯问
权利告知
非法供述排除
interrogation
inform rights
illegal-obtained confession exclusion
