期刊文献+

Dynesys动态中和系统和经后路椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性变的疗效比较 被引量:5

Comparative study of dynamic neutralization system and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in treating lumbar degenerative disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析动态中和系统和经后路椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性变的疗效差异。方法选择在该院接受治疗的腰椎退行性变患者作为研究对象,随机分为接受经后路椎间融合术治疗的对照组及接受动态中和系统治疗的观察组,比较两组患者的手术相关指标、腰椎功能评分及腰椎活动度差异。结果观察组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量及住院时间均明显少于对照组患者(P<0.05)。观察组患者接受治疗后6及12个月的腰椎间盘功能评分值均显著低于对照组患者(P<0.05)。观察组患者术后的治疗节段ROM值明显大于对照组(P<0.05),邻近节段治疗后ROM值明显小于对照组(P<0.05)。结论动态中和系统用于腰椎退行性变患者的治疗,手术创伤较小,且在治疗后腰椎功能及活动度上具有明显优势。 【Objective】To compare the dynamic neutralization system and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in treating lumbar degenerative disease. 【Methods】The patients with Lumbar degenerative disease in our hospital were randomly divided into control group treated with Posterior lumbar interbody fusion and observation group with dynamic neutralization system, surgery related index differences, lumbar function score and lumbar spine mobilitywere compared.【Results】Observation group patients operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total length of hospital stay were significantly less than control group patients(P〈0.05). Observation group patients were treated for 6months and 12 months after lumbar function score values were significantly lower than control group patients(P〈0.05). Observation group patients postoperative segmental ROM value was greater than control group significantly(P〈0.05), adjacent segment ROM value was less than control group patients significantly after treatment(P〈0.05).【Conclusions】Dynamicneutralization systemis used for the treatment of patients with lumbar degeneration, with less surgical trauma, and after treatment on lumbar function and mobility has obvious advantages.
出处 《中国现代医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第28期104-107,共4页 China Journal of Modern Medicine
关键词 动态中和系统 腰椎退行性变 经后路椎间融合术 dynamic neutralization system lumbar degenerative disease posterior lumbar interbody fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献34

  • 1迟大明,朱悦.非融合固定在退行性腰椎疾病中的应用[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(10):622-625. 被引量:15
  • 2殷渠东,Jeanneret B.Dynesys治疗腰椎退变和不稳(附13例报告)[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(7):491-493. 被引量:21
  • 3Nerurkar NL, Orlansky AS, Sen S, et al. Muhiscale tissue engineering of the intervertebral disc. Transactions of the 54th annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society[ R]. San Francisco:CA,2008. 被引量:1
  • 4Kettler A, Drumm J, Heuer F,et al. Can a modified interspinous spac- er prevent instability in axial rotation and lateraI bending? A biome- chanical in vitro study resulting in a new idea [ J ]. Clin Biomech, 2008,23:242 - 247. 被引量:1
  • 5Senegas J, Vital JM, Pointillart V, et al. Long - term actuarial survivor- ship analysis of an intempinoas stabilization system [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 2007,16 : 1279 - 1287. 被引量:1
  • 6Huang RC, Wright TM, Panjabi MM, et al. Biomechanics of nonfusion implants[J].Orthop Clin North Am, 2005,36 (3): 271-280. 被引量:1
  • 7Chou WY, Hsu CJ, Chang WN, et al. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar spinal posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in elderly patient[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2002,122 (1) : 39-43. 被引量:1
  • 8Sengupta DK. Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain[J].Orthop Clin North Am,2004,35(1) :43 56. 被引量:1
  • 9McKenna PJ, Freeman BJ, Mulholland RC, et al. A prospec tive, randomised controlled trial of femoral ring allograft versus a titanium cage in circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with minimum 2 year clinical results[J]. Eur Spine J, 2005,14 (8) : 727-737. 被引量:1
  • 10Kjaer P, Korsholm L, Bendix T, et al. Modic changes and their associations with clinical findings[J]. Eur Spine, 2006,15 (9) 1312-1319. 被引量:1

共引文献16

同被引文献75

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部