期刊文献+

技术进步、能源效率与回弹效应——来自中国省际面板数据的经验测算 被引量:14

Technological Progress,Energy Efficiency and Rebound Effect——Empirical Estimation Basedon China's Provincial Panel Data
原文传递
导出
摘要 从能源效率弹性定义出发,将能源效率和劳动供给引入内生增长模型,构建了中国长期能源回弹效应的宏观模型,利用省级面板数据测算了全国以及28个省份1987~2012年的能源回弹效应。结果表明:(1)中国宏观经济的能源回弹效应均值为85.89%,东、中、西部分别为87.24%、88.66%和82.35%,能源效率提高引致的节能效果绝大部分并未实现,且历年回弹效应的变化并没有出现稳定的规律;(2)各省能源回弹效应总体表现为部分回弹,随着时间而变化的趋势存在一定差异性。本文的结论和政策含义为制定合理的长期能源政策组合提供有益参考。 This paper introduced energy efficiency and labor supply to the endogenous growth model from the energy efficiency elas- ticity definition, and built the long-term China's macro energy rebound effect model to estimate national and provincial energy rebound effect in 1987-2012 by using provincial panel data. The results showed that: ( 1 ) China's macroeconomic energy rebound effect is 85.89%, the rebound effect of eastern area, midland area, western area are 87.24%, 88.66% and 82.35%, respectively. Energy savings resulting from energy efficiency improvement have not been totally realized. There has been no particular change trend about the rebound effect size over years. (2) All provinces represent partial rebound as a whole, but.there are some differences among the provinces over time. The paper and its implications provide a useful reference to make long-term energy policy for energy policymakers.
出处 《山西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第11期50-59,共10页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"制度性贫困与包容性增长减贫模式研究"(11CJL033)
关键词 技术进步 能源效率 回弹效应 测算 technological progress energy efficiency rebound effect estimation
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Berkhout P H G, Muskens J C, Vehhuijsen J W. Defining the Rebound Effect[J]. Energy Policy, 2000, 28(6-7):425-432. 被引量:1
  • 2Greene. Why CAFE Worked[J]. Energy Policy, 1998, 26(8):595-613. 被引量:1
  • 3Lee Schipper, Michael Grubb. On the Rebound? Feedback between Energy Intensities and Energy Uses in IEA Countries[ J ]. Energy Policy, 2000, 28 (6-7):367-388. 被引量:1
  • 4Brookes L G. Energy Efficiency and Economic Fallacies: a Reply[J]. Energy Policy, 1992, 20(5):390-392. 被引量:1
  • 5Saunders H D. The Khazzoom-Brookes Postulate and Neoclassical Growth[J]. Energy Journal, 1992, 13(4):131-148. 被引量:1
  • 6Binswanger M. Technological Progress and Sustainable Development: What about the Rebound Effect?[J]. Ecological Eco-nomics, 2001, 36( 1 ): 119-132. 被引量:1
  • 7Saunders H D. Fuel Conserving (and Using) Production Functions [ J ]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(5 ) :2184-2235. 被引量:1
  • 8Sorrell S. Jevons' Paradox Revisited: The Evidence for Backfire from Improved Energy Efficiency [J]. Energy Policy, 2009,37(4):1456-1469. 被引量:1
  • 9Jevons W S. The Coal Question: Can Britain Survive?[M]. London:Republished by Macmillan, 1865. 被引量:1
  • 10Greening L A, Greene D L, Difiglio C..Energy Efficiency and Consumption-the Rebound Effect——a Survey[J]. Energy Pol- icy, 2000, 28(6-7):389-401. 被引量:1

二级参考文献229

共引文献8068

同被引文献179

二级引证文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部