摘要
根据河口村水库坝址段地质地形条件,选择了4条坝址线,并对可行的3条进行了比选。通过对二坝址(线)混凝土面板堆石坝与沥青心墙坝、三坝址(线)的碾压混凝土重力坝及四坝址(线)混凝土面板堆石坝坝型进行技术经济比较可知,存在的地质问题都可以通过工程措施予以解决。进一步的研究和论证结果表明,修建混凝土重力坝和混凝土面板坝及沥青混凝土心墙坝在技术上均可行,二坝址(线)混凝土面板堆石坝方案在投资、工期及施工方面更具优势。
There was no technical element to restrict or negative the existing dam type in three dam sites（lines）through the technical and economic comparison with the second dam site（line）concrete face rockfill dam（with asphalt concrete core wall dam）,the third dam site（line）of roller compacted concrete gravity dam type and the fourth dam site（line）concrete face rockfill dam type. The existing geological problems all could be solved through engineering measures. Further research and argumentation results show that building concrete gravity dam and concrete face dam and asphalt concrete core wall dam in technology is feasible and the second dam site（line）concrete face rockfill dam scheme in investment,schedule and construction is more advantages.
出处
《人民黄河》
CAS
北大核心
2014年第10期100-102,共3页
Yellow River
关键词
混凝土面板堆石坝
混凝土重力坝
沥青混凝土心墙坝
坝型比较
坝址(线)
河口村水库
concrete face rockfill dam
concrete gravity dam
asphalt concrete core wall darn
dam type comparison
dam site （line）
Hekoucun Rcservior
