摘要
目的观察分别采用穴位贴敷法、点刺四缝穴法、两者结合法治疗小儿慢性咳嗽的疗效差异。方法 90例患者随机分为3组(穴位贴敷组、点刺四缝穴组和两者结合组),每组30例。取穴均为肺俞、脾俞、肾俞、四缝穴等,通过回访观测证候量表分数的变化,从而比较单纯及结合两种疗法的不同疗效。结果穴位贴敷组、点刺四缝穴组和两者结合组的总有效率分别是83.3%、80.0%和93.3%,治疗后证候积分有显著差异,均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论穴位贴敷、点刺四缝穴及两者结合法均能改善小儿慢性咳嗽患者的病情,其中两者结合组的疗效明显优于其他组,是安全有效、简便易行的中医外治法。
Objective To observe the treatment difference of using acupiont application alone, pricking Sifeng （EX-UE10） alone, and combination of the two therapies in treating infantile chronic cough. Method Ninety patients were randomized into 3 groups （acupoint application group, pricking Sifeng group, and a combining group）, 30 in each group. Same points were selected for the three groups：Feishu （BL13）, Pishu （BL20）, Shenshu （BL23）, and Sifeng （EX-UE 10）. By follow-up research of the symptom scale, the therapeutic efficacies were compared. Result The total effective rate was 83.3%in the acupoint application group, 80.0%in the pricking Sifeng （EX-UE 10） group, and 93.3%in the combining group;meanwhile, the symptom scores were significantly changed after intervention in all three groups （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Separate use and combining use of acupoint application and pricking Sifeng （EX-UE 10） all can improve the condition of infantile chronic cough, while the combining use can produce a significantly higher therapeutic efficacy, thus it’s a safe, effective, and easy-to-operate external treatment in traditional Chinese medicine.
出处
《上海针灸杂志》
2014年第10期920-921,共2页
Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
基金
珠海市科技局医学科研基金立项课题(2012007)
关键词
点刺
穴
四缝
穴位贴敷法
咳嗽
Pricking needling
Acupoint sticking therapy
Cough
