摘要
17世纪的多恩研究,围绕"才"和"象"这对核心观念,经历了品评、颂扬、反思三个阶段。反思预示着20世纪的理论争鸣,而品评和赞扬则揭示了人们对16世纪末那种典雅、细腻、优美、极富乐感的抒情诗传统的摈弃。17世纪的研究尽管有着强烈的品评性质,但分析较为肤浅,反思也不系统,却反映了当时的英国诗坛的基本走向和一般状况,特别是琼生、卡洛、德莱顿等人的评价,更对后来三百多年的多恩研究产生了重大而深远的影响。即便在今天,有关多恩研究的选题依据、分析方法和基本走向,连同多恩诗的类别划分和核心概念,都可见到17世纪的影子,甚至研究重点、研究空白、争论焦点、审美关照等,都显示出对17世纪的多恩研究的一种回应、继承与发展。
In the 17th century, John Donne studies witnessed a concentrated discussion of his wit and conceit as well as a marked progress from personal appreciation via lavish admiration to critical assessment. While the last proves a harbinger of theoretical disputes in the 20th century, the first two reveal a turn against the lyrical tradition that, by the end of the 16th century, had become extremely gentle, graceful, refined and full of music. Inadequate, shallow and fragmental as they were, the achievements in the 17th century somehow mirrored the basic trend and milieu of that era. Particular significance went to Ben Jonson, Thomas Carew, and John Dryden, whose originality and insights were to exercise a profound influence on Donne studies throughout the centuries to come. Current studies of Donne, including the focus in subject matter, analytical approaches, general trends, classification of Donne＇s poems, and key terms of speculation, are, to a great extant, a continuation and a testimony of the tradition already established in the 17th century. Even academic emphasis, research vacancies, theoretical controversies and aesthetic acceptance are largely identical, though with many differences.
出处
《外国文学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第5期117-125,共9页
Foreign Literature Studies
基金
国家社科基金项目"多恩研究批判史"【项目批号:2011BW137】的阶段性成果
关键词
多恩研究
17世纪
品评
颂扬
反思
John Donne studies
seventeenth century
arbitrariness
admiration
assessment
