期刊文献+

加拿大专利赔偿案件计算侵权人利润法及启示 被引量:1

Accounting of Profits in Canadian Patent Infringement Cases and Chinese Inspiration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决我国司法实践中专利侵权赔偿计算难和"法定赔偿"适用比例高的问题,通过分析加拿大"计算侵权人利润"法的产生背景、特征、典型案例、适用与不适用情形,及其在加拿大判例法上的发展历程,强调这一计算法存在的重要性及其与传统损害赔偿计算法相比的优势,提出我国在司法实践中应借鉴加拿大"计算侵权人利润"法中的"实际利润法"和"差额利润法"。 To cope with the difficulty in accounting the amount of patent infringement damages and to solve the problem of frequent application of the statutory damage in China,this paper studies the accounting of profits,the counterpart of the in-fringer’s profit in Canada,which is an equitable remedy and has special case law tradition,application rules,burden of evidence,and some advantages compared with the lost profit method and reasonable royalty.The conclusion is that the ac-counting of profits is quite important and China can learn from Canada’s experiences by adopting actual profit method and differential profit method in order to refine the calculation method of patent infringement in judiciary.
作者 赵歆 刘晓海
机构地区 同济大学法学院
出处 《科技管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第20期142-147,共6页 Science and Technology Management Research
基金 国家社会科学基金重大招标项目"促进自主创新能力建设的国家知识产权政策体系研究"(12&ZD073) 国家知识产权局专利保护重点联系机制工作项目"专利侵权损害赔偿额计算"(20121029952)
关键词 知识产权保护 专利侵权赔偿 计算侵权人利润 实际利润法 差额利润法 intellectual property protection patent infringement damages accounting of profits actual profits method,differential profits method
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1《专利法》第65条. 被引量:4
  • 2张维.97%专利侵权案判决采取法定赔偿[EB/OL].法制日报.(2001-04-16)[2013-12-20].http://eppen1egaldaily.COlll.on/fzrb/content/20130416/Artieel060D5GN.htmI. 被引量:1
  • 3刘欢欢..中国、加拿大专利法比较研究[D].兰州大学,2009:
  • 4HOGAN LOVELLS, MARTIN FAEHNDRICH, ADAM COOKE, etal. Assessment of damages ( and accounts of profits) in patent litiga- tion: Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom [EB/OL]. (2010- 07 -22) [2013 - 12 -01 ]. http: //www. lexology, corn/library/ detail, aspx? g =4afff3ff - fe2c -42ce - 867d - 286db908b825. 被引量:1
  • 5Teledyne Industries Inc. v. Lido Industrial Products Ltd. 68 C. P. R. 2d204, 207 (Can Fed. Ct, 1982) GREGORY C LUDLOW, ANNE M GODBOUT. Recent developments in Canadian law: Survey of intellectual property, part IV - patents [J]. Ottawa Law Review, 1998, 30 (117) : 531 -534. 被引量:1
  • 6The Patent Act, R. S. C. , 1985. ChapterP-4. Section57 (1) (b). 被引量:1
  • 7ALEXANDER J STACK, SCOTt DAVIDSON, STEPHEN R COLE. Accounting of profits calculations in intellectual property cases in Can- ada [J]. Canadian Intellectual Property Review, 2000, 17 (21) : 438 - 443. 被引量:1
  • 8LARRY COURY. Notes C'est what? Saisie! A comparison of patent infringement remedies among the G7 eeonomic nations [ EB/OL ]. (2003 -08 -27) [2013 - 12 -20]. httpz //law2. fordham, edu/ ihtml/page3g_ nob. ihtml? imae = 1264&pubID = 200&articleid = 1585 Ductmatev. Exxano. 16 C. P. R. 3d 15, 20 (F. C. T. D., 1987 ) '. 被引量:1
  • 9Ductmatev. Exxano. 16 C. P. R. 3d 15, 20 (F. C. T. D., 1987 ) '. 被引量:1
  • 10Unilever PLC et al. v. Procter & Gamble Inc. et al. 47 C. P. R. 3d479, 572 (F. C. T. D. , 1993). 被引量:1

同被引文献19

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部