期刊文献+

MSCT和^(18)F-FDGPET-CT显像对食管癌术前分期诊断的价值 被引量:3

Diagnostic and application value of MSCT and ^(18)F-FDG PET-CT scans in preoperative staging of esophageal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 经内镜和病理证实并接受手术治疗的182例食管癌患者入组,患者均在术前1周接受多层螺旋CT(MSCT)和氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描CT(18F-FDG PET-CT)扫描,结合图像信息,记录其术前分期,并与术后病理结果比较。MSCT与18F-FDG PET-CT扫描对判断T分期准确率的差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.540,P=0.463),而18F-FDG PETCT扫描对判断N分期的灵敏度、特异度及准确率均高于MSCT(P<0.05);术前MSCT扫描检测T、N分期与术后病理一致性差(Kappa=0.376,Kappa=0.317,P<0.01),而术前18F-FDG PET-CT扫描检测N分期与术后病理高度一致(Kappa=0.750,P<0.01)。 The clinical data obtained from 182 cases with esophageal cancer proved by pathology endoscopy were retrospectively analyzed, which were treated with surgery. Multi-slice computer tomography( MSCT) and 18 F-FDG positron emission tomograp-hy combined computed tomography(18 F-FDG PET-CT) scans were underwent for the patients within one week before treatment;combined with the images to record the preoperative MSCT and 18 F-FDG PET-CT staging,TNM staging of the patients with operation was compared with post-operative pathological results based on various imaging findings. In comparison to post-operative pathological results,the difference between accu-racy of T staging diagnosed by MSCT and PET-CT was no significance (P〈0.05),but the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of regional lymph node metastases diagnosed by PET-CT had an advantage over that by MSCT ( P〈0.05). The Kappa values for MSCT scans in T and N staging diagnosis were not ideal(Kappa〈0.40,P〈0.01), but it was favorable for preoperative PET-CT scans in N staging diagnosis(Kappa〉0. 40,P〈0.01).
出处 《安徽医科大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第10期1495-1498,共4页 Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
基金 安徽省卫生厅医学科研课题计划(编号:13ZC020)
关键词 食管肿瘤 体层摄影术 肿瘤分期 诊断 评价研究 esophagus neoplasms tomography neoplasm staging diagnosis evaluaion studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Gondi V, Bradley K, Mehta M,et al. Impact of hybrid fluorodeox-yglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography onradiotherapyplanning in esophageal and non-small-celllungcancer[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2007,67( 1) : 187 -95. 被引量:1
  • 2非手术治疗食管癌的临床分期标准(草案)[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2010(3):179-180. 被引量:257
  • 3Edge S B,Compton C C. The American Joint Committee on Canc-er: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the fu-ture of TNM[ J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2010,17(6) : 1471 -4. 被引量:1
  • 4Yoon S K,Jung J I,Park M J,et al. Multidetector CT assessment oflymph node size for nodal staging in patients with potentially oper-able squamous esophageal cancer and the 18F-FDG positron emis-sion tomography CT correlation[ J]. J Korean Soc Radiol,2010,62(3)-235 -43. 被引量:1
  • 5Thurau K,Palmes D,Franzius C,et al. Impact of PET-CT on pri-mary staging and response control on multimodal treatment of e-sophageal cancerf J]. World J Surg,2011,35(3) :608 ~ 16. 被引量:1
  • 6Chen T W,Yang Z G,Li Y,et al. Quantitative assessment of first-pass perfusion of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma using 64-section MDCT: initial observation[ J]. Clin Radiol,2009,64(1):38 -45. 被引量:1
  • 7Plathow C,Staab A,Schmaehl A,et al. Computed tomography,pos-itixm emission tomography,positron emission tomo^aphy/computedtomography,and magnetic resonance imaging for staging of limitedpleural mesothelioma : initial results [ J ]. Invest Radiol, 2008,43(10):737-44. 被引量:1
  • 8Tanabe S,Naomoto Y,Shirakawa Y,et al. F-18FDG PET/CT con-tributes to more accurate detection of lymph nodal metastasis fromactively proliferating esoph^eal squamous cell carcinoma[ J]. ClinNucl Med,2011,36(10) :854 -9. 被引量:1
  • 9Roedl J B,Blake M A,Holalkere N S,et al. Lymph node staging inesophageal adenocarcinoma with PET-CT based on a visual analysisand based on metabolic parameters [ J ]. Abdom Imaging,2009,34(5):610-7. 被引量:1
  • 10van Vliet E P,Heijenbrok-Kal M H,Hunink M G,et al. Staging in-vestigations for oesophageal cancer:a meta-analysis[ J]. Br J Canc-er’2008,98(3):547 -57. 被引量:1

二级参考文献8

共引文献256

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部