期刊文献+

不同体位高分辨率食管测压检测下食管括约肌静息压的比较分析 被引量:2

Comparative analysis of LESP with high-resolution manometry in different positions
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 了解不同体位对临床高分辨率食管测压检测下食管括约肌静息压力(LESP)结果的影响.方法 对临床有检查适应证的40例患者行高分辨率测压(HRM),按照性别、年龄、疾病进行分组比较,分析坐位及平卧位LESP的差异.结果 受检患者下食管括约肌(LES)上缘及下缘距鼻孔平均距离为(42.8±3.3)cm和(45.6±3.7)cm,LES长度为(2.8±0.8)cm.根据受检患者身高分组,组间食管括约肌位置及长度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).不同性别患者其平卧位及坐位LESP差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).随着年龄的增加,LESP逐渐降低,但体位对其无明显影响.反流性食管炎患者平卧位LESP为(9.38 ±2.95) mmHg,坐位LESP为(11.35±4.09) mmHg,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);贲门失迟缓症患者平卧位LESP为(46.40±1.13) mmHg,坐位LESP为(43.78±2.38) mmHg,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).非糜烂性胃食管反流病(NERD)及无明确食管疾病患者不同体位LESP比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 临床中应根据患者症状采用不同体位进行检查,以增加疾病诊断的敏感性. Objective To investigate the effects of lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) with high-resolution manometry (HRM) in different positions. Methods A total of 40 patients were tested with 36-channel HRM. Results of LESP were analyzed in sitting and supine position. Results The aver- age distance from the upper edge and the lower edge of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to nose were (42.8 ±3.3 ) cm and ( 45.6 ± 3.7 ) cm, respectively. The length of LES was ( 2.8 ±0.8 ) cm. There were no significant differences in the length or position of LES among different height groups of the patients. In addition, there were no significant differences in sitting and supine position of LESP between males and fe- males. With the increasing of age, LESP decreased gradually. In patients with reflux esophagitis, LESP was significantly lower in supine position than in sitting position. In patients with aehalasia, LESP was signifi- candy higher in supine position than in sitting position. There were no significant differences in the pa- tients with non-erosive reflux disease or without definite esophageal disease. Conclusion In order to in- crease the sensitivity of diagnosis in esophageal disease, LESP in different positions should be tested according to the patients' symptoms
出处 《临床内科杂志》 CAS 2014年第8期526-528,共3页 Journal of Clinical Internal Medicine
基金 中国博士后科学基金面向项目(2014M552691) 辽宁省博士启动基金(20141177)
关键词 高分辨率测压 体位 下食管括约肌静息压 HRM Different positions Lower esophageal sphincter pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献80

  • 1PilarJimenez,ElenaPiazuelo,M.TeresaSanchez,JavierOrtego,FernandoSoteras,AngelLanas.Free radicals and antioxidant systems in reflux esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(18):2697-2703. 被引量:8
  • 2Fox MR,Bredenoord AJ.Oesophageal high-resolution manometry:moving from research into clinical practice.Gut,2008,57:405-423. 被引量:1
  • 3Clouse R,Staiano A.Topography of the esophageal peristaltic pressure wave.Am J Physiol,1991,261:G677-684. 被引量:1
  • 4Bernhard A,Pohl D,Fried M,et al.Influence of bolus consistency and position on esophageal high-resolution manometry findings.Dig Dis Sci,2008,53:1198-1205. 被引量:1
  • 5Chen CL,Yi CH.Assessment of esophageal motor function using combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry in healthy volunteers:a single-center study in Taiwan.J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2007,22:1039-1043. 被引量:1
  • 6Tutuian R,Vela MF,Balaji NS,et al.Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry:multicenter study in healthy volunteers.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol,2003,1:174-182. 被引量:1
  • 7Alves LMT,Cassiani RA,Santos CM,et al.Gender effect on the clinical measurement of swallowing.Arq Gastroenterol,2007,44:227-229. 被引量:1
  • 8Robbins JA,Hamilton JW,Lof GL,et al.Oropharyngeal swallowing in normal adults of different ages.Gastroenterology,1992,103:823-829. 被引量:1
  • 9Dantas RO,Ferriolli E,Souza MAN.Gender effects on esophageal motility.Braz J Med Biol Res,1998,31:539-544. 被引量:1
  • 10Dantas RO,Alves LM,Cassiani Rde A.Gender differences in proximal esophageal contracions.Arq Gastmenterol,2009,46:284-287. 被引量:1

共引文献27

同被引文献46

  • 1马小风,陈更业,吴静,周晶,杨小珍,何步梅.不同重力喂养体位在极低出生体重儿喂养中的效果比较[J].宁夏医学杂志,2020(9):813-815. 被引量:6
  • 2王虹,田园,丁燕.胃食管反流病的食管动力功能[J].中国医学科学院学报,2010,32(4):465-469. 被引量:12
  • 3Clouse RE, Staiano A. Topography of the esophageal peristaltic pressure wave[J].Am J Physiol, 1991,261 (4) : G677-G684. 被引量:1
  • 4Bredenoord AJ,Smout AJ.High-resolution manometry[J].Dig Liver Dis ,2008,40 (3) : 174-181. 被引量:1
  • 5Roman S,Gyawali CP,Xiao Y,et al. The Chicago Classification of Motility Disorders An Update[J]. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 2014,24(4) :545-561. 被引量:1
  • 6Howard PJ,Maher L,Pryde A, et al.Five year prospective study of the incidence, clinical features, and diagnosis of achalasia in Ed- inburgh[J].Gut, 1992,33 (8) : 1011-1015. 被引量:1
  • 7E1-Takli-I, OBrien P, Paterson WG.Clinical diagnosis of achalasi- a: how reliable is the barium x-ray? [J]. Can J Gastroenteroly, 2006,20 (5) : 335-336. 被引量:1
  • 8Ghosh SK,Pandolfino JE,John Rice,et al. Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry:a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls.Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2007,293 (4) : G878-G885. 被引量:1
  • 9Hyun JJ,Bak YT.Clinical significance of hiatal hemia[J].Gut Liv- er,2011,5(3) : 267-277. 被引量:1
  • 10Tagle Arr6spide M, Aguinaga Meza M, V6squez Rubio G.Hiatat hernia as a risk factor for erosive esphagitis:experience and en-] doscopic findings of a Peruvian population with heartbum[J].Re1 Gastroenterol Peru, 2003,23 ( 1 ) : 36-40. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部