期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌根治术术后吻合口瘘发生率的Meta分析 被引量:18

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 系统评价结直肠癌开腹手术与腹腔镜手术术后吻合口瘘发生率的差异。方法 检索2003年9月~2013年9月公开发表的关于结直肠癌腹腔镜根治术(腹腔镜组)与开腹根治术(开腹组)治疗结直肠癌的随机对照研究,对两种术式术后吻合口瘘发生情况进行Meta分析。结果 共8篇文献纳入分析,共2603例结直肠癌患者,其中腹腔镜组1287例,术后发生吻合口瘘34例;开腹组1316例,术后发生吻合口瘘28例。各项研究的同质性良好(P=0.56,I^2=0),采用固定模型分析。各研究有关发表偏倚的漏斗图呈对称倒置分布漏斗型,发表偏倚小。经Meta分析,腹腔镜组术后吻合口瘘发生率为开腹组的1.25倍,但两组差异无统计学意义( RR=1.25,95%CI:0.77~2.03,P>0.05)。结论 相对于开腹手术,腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术并不增加术后吻合口瘘的发生率。
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 2014年第18期66-68,共3页 Shandong Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Booth RA. Mminimally invasive biomarkers for detection and stag- ing of colorectal cancer[J]. Cancer Lerrers, 2007,249( 1 ) :87- 96. 被引量:1
  • 2Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, et al. Definition and grad- ing of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rec- tum: a proposal by the international study group of rectal cancer[ J]. Surgery, 2010,147 (3) :339-351. 被引量:1
  • 3周灿,陈武科,何建军,任予,王珂,牛利刚,周瑜辉.国内直肠癌术后吻合口瘘危险因素的Meta分析[J].西安交通大学学报(医学版),2010,31(1):115-121. 被引量:75
  • 4Liang X, Hou S, Liu H, et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Laparo- scopic ResectionVersus Open Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cane- er: A Randomized, Controlled Trial fmmChina[ J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech, 2011,21 (5) :381-385. 被引量:1
  • 5Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancerafter neoadjuvant chemoradio- therapy ( COREAN trial ) : short-term outcomes of an open-label randomized controlled trlal[ J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010, 11 (7) :637 - 645. 被引量:1
  • 6Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, et al. Survival after laparo- scopic surgery versus open surgery for colon caneer: long-term out- come of a randomized clinical trial [ J ]. Lancet Oncol, 2009,10 ( 1 ) :44-52. 被引量:1
  • 7Janson M, Lindholm E, Anderberg B, et al. Randomized trial of health-related quality of life after open and laparoscopie surgery for colon cancer[ J]. Surg Endose, 2007,21 (5) :747-753. 被引量:1
  • 8Li JC, Leung KL, Ng SS, et al . Laparoseopic-assisted versus open resection of fight-sided colonic cancer-a prospective random- ized controlled trial [ J ]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2012,27 ( 1 ) : 95- 102. 被引量:1
  • 9Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer[ J] . Br J Surg, 2009,96( 1 ) :982-989. 被引量:1
  • 10GonzOlez IA, Luis HD, Malag6n AM,et al. A comparative clinical study of short-tern1 resuhs of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer during the learning curve[ J ]. Int .1 Colnrectal Dis, 2006,21 (4) : 590-595. 被引量:1

二级参考文献80

共引文献127

同被引文献144

引证文献18

二级引证文献152

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部