摘要
关于污染环境罪的罪过形式,我国刑法理论上存在过失说与故意说之争。大部分学者坚持过失说,故意说是少部分学者所持的观点。过失说认为,对故意造成严重污染环境结果发生的行为可以依照投放危险物质罪定罪处罚。然而,这会导致故意造成严重污染环境结果但未造成公私财产重大损失或人身伤亡的行为得不到处罚。故意说将过失造成严重污染环境结果的行为排除在处罚范围之外,这不符合严厉打击污染环境犯罪之刑事政策的要求。因而,只有将污染环境罪的罪过形式解释为既包括过失也包括故意,才不至于出现处罚上的空当。
There is a debate between negligence and intention in theory of criminal law, of crime of polluting environment. Most of scholars uphold the opinion of negligence while concerning form of sin opinion of intention is supported by a few scholars. According to opinion of negligence, the behavior deliberately causing serious environmental pollution can be convicted and punished according to crime of throwing dangerous materials. But this will result in the fact that some behaviors can not be punished, such as some behaviors that deliberately cause serious environmental pollution but do intention, the behavior causing serious penalty, which is not in line with the Therefore, only by interpreting form of of penalty be avoided. not cause major property loss and life casualty. According to opinion of environmental pollution because of negligence is excluded from the scope of requirement of severely cracking down on crime of polluting environment. sin of crime of polluting environment as negligence and intention, can blank
出处
《山东警察学院学报》
2014年第3期55-58,共4页
Journal of Shandong Police College
基金
2012年度国家社科基金项目<环境污染犯罪治理问题研究>(项目编号:12BFX051)
2012年度河北省社科规划项目<环境污染犯罪治理的现状及其对策研究>(项目编号:HB12FX034)的阶段性成果
关键词
污染环境罪
罪过形式
体系解释
crime of polluting environment, form of sin, systematic interpretation
