摘要
在大调解的格局之下,调解作为民事争议解决的重要方式,其作用和效果在不断加强。根据《民事诉讼法》和各地法院的司法实践,民事诉调对接机制在不断完善。知识产权案件作为一类特殊的民事案件,由于其独特性导致在司法实践之中,一直保持较高的调撤率。而各地关于知识产权案件的调解创新机制,使得调解的比例持续增高。虽然调解能够及时化解矛盾,节约诉讼成本,但案结事了不意味着法律的公平正义一定得到彰显。因此在推动民事诉讼诉调对接的同时,应当坚持"能调则调,当判则判",保持对于法律正义的追求。
Under the situation of mediation mechanism, as crucial forms of civil controversy solution, the mediationg function and effect have been increasingly enhanced. In accordance with Civil Procedure Law and the juridical practice of local court, civil litigation＇s intermediation mechanism has been constantly improved. As a special civil ease, the intellectual property has remained high withdrawal rate due to its uniqueness, yet the innovative system of litigation in local courts made the mediating rate maintain constantly increasing. Although mediation could melt paradoxes in time and saving lawsuit cost, the ending does not imply the laws justice has been represented. Hence, while promoting civil lawsuit＇s litigation intermediation, we should insist on the principle of moderate practice to maintain justice pursuit.
出处
《陕西青年职业学院学报》
2014年第2期55-57,62,共4页
Journal of Shaanxi Youth Vocational College
关键词
审前调解
诉调对接机制
调撤率
知识产权案件
Preparatory Mediation
Litigation and Conciliation Docking System
Transfer and Withdrawal rates
Case of Intellectual Properties
