期刊文献+

经内镜乳头括约肌切开取石术与传统开腹胆总管切开取石术治疗胆总管结石的疗效比较 被引量:11

The clinical effect between open choledocholithoyomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy( EST) in the treatment of common bile duct stones
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经内镜乳头括约肌切开取石术与传统开腹胆总管切开取石术治疗胆总管结石的临床疗效。方法选择我院2010年6月至2013年1月行手术治疗胆总管结石患者70例,其中行内镜乳头括约肌切开取石术35例作为治疗组,开腹胆总管切开取石手术治疗35例作为对照组。观察并比较两组临床疗效结果。结果 70例手术均获成功。其中观察组在手术时间、引流时间、术后下床活动时间、术后排气恢复时间、术后住院天数、术后并发症发生率方面均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论经内镜乳头括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石具有创伤小、术后恢复快、痛苦少、住院时间短及术后并发症少等优点,是目前治疗胆总管结石的理想微创术式之一,临床上值得推广应用。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect between open choledocholithoyomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) in the treatment of common bile duct stones. Methods 70 patients diagnosed as choledocholithiasis in our hospital from June 2010 to January 2013 were selected into treatment group and control group. 35 cases in treatment group were treated with endoscopic sphincterotomy, 35 cases in control group were received conventional open choledocholithoyomy surgery. The clinical effect were ob- served and compared by the two groups. Results The operations were successful in all the 70 cases. Compared with the control group, patients treated with EST had a shorter operation time, shorter drainage time, earlier postoperative ambulation, quicker postop- erative intestinal exhaust time shorter postoperative hospitalization stay and little the incidence rate of postoperative complications (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion EST in the treatment of common bile duct stones has its advantages as minimal injury, quick recovery, less pain, shorter hospitalization time and fewer postoperative complications and it' s ideal for minimally invasive surgical approach, worthy of clinical application.
作者 马召锋
出处 《肝胆外科杂志》 2014年第4期294-296,共3页 Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
关键词 胆总管结石 经内镜乳头括约肌切开术(EST) 胆总管切开取石术 Choledocholithiasis endoscopic sphincterotomy open choledocholithoyomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献107

  • 1于进,张玉清,冀明.腹腔镜联合内镜治疗胆囊胆总管结石疗效观察[J].中国现代医药杂志,2006,8(8):55-56. 被引量:4
  • 2[4]Berman J,Rauws E,Fockens P.Randomised trial of endosco-pic baloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bileduct stones[J].Lacent,1997,349:1 124 被引量:1
  • 3[7]Cipolletta L,Costamagna G,Bianco MA,et al.Endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy of difficult common bile stones[J].Br J Surg,1997,84:1 407~1 409 被引量:1
  • 4[14]Phillip EH.New techniques for the treatment of common bi-le duct calculi encountered during laparoscopic cholecystec-tomy[J].Probl Gen Sury,1991,8:387 被引量:1
  • 5[17]Memon MA,Hassaballa H,Memon MI.Laparoscopic com-mon bile duct exploration:the past,he present,and the future[J] .Am J Surg,2000,179(4):309~315 被引量:1
  • 6[1]Davidson BR,Neoptolemos JP,Carr-Locke DL.Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct calculi in patients with gall bladder in situ considered unfit for surgery.Gut 1988; 29:114-120 被引量:1
  • 7[2]Escourrou J,Cordova JA,Lazorthes F,Frexinos J,Ribet A.Early and late complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy for biliary lithiasis with and without the gall bladder ‘in situ'.Gut 1984; 25:598-602 被引量:1
  • 8[3]Kawai K,Akasaka Y,Murakami K,Tada M,Koli Y.Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater.Gastrointest Endosc 1974; 20:148-151 被引量:1
  • 9[4]Pereira-Lima JC,Jakobs R,Winter UH,Benz C,Martin WR,Adamek HE,Riemann JF.Long-term results (7 to 10 years) of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis.Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for the recurrence of biliary symptoms.Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:457-464 被引量:1
  • 10[5]Tanaka M,Takahata S,Konomi H,Matsunaga H,Yokohata K,Takeda T,Utsunomiya N,Ikeda S.Long-term consequence of endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones.Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:465-469 被引量:1

共引文献32

同被引文献106

  • 1谢曦,戚建芬.肝段切除与胆管切开取石术治疗肝内结石的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(12):3478-3479. 被引量:20
  • 2曹辉国.腹腔镜胆总管切开取石后一期缝合治疗胆总管结石疗效观察[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2012,34(3):305-306. 被引量:10
  • 3陈安平,赵聪,陈大夫,王思明,肖宏,温宜清.腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术治疗细径胆总管结石[J].中国实用外科杂志,2005,25(11):673-674. 被引量:49
  • 4Enns R, Baillie J.Review article,the treatment of acute biliarypancreatitis. Alimeut Pharmacol Ther, 1999;13(1 I): 1379- 1389. 被引量:1
  • 5Grubnik VV, Tkachenko Al,llyashenko VV, et al.Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus open surgery: comparative prospective randomized trial.Surg Endosc,2012;26 (8):2165-2171. 被引量:1
  • 6Savita KS,Bhartia VK.Laparoscopic CBD exploration.lndian J Surg,2010;72(S ):395-399. 被引量:1
  • 7Bouwense SA,Besselink MG,Brunschot S,et al.Pancreatitis of biliary origin,optimal timing of cholecystectomy (PONCHO trial):study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [J].Trials,2012; 13(1): 225. 被引量:1
  • 8Bouwense SA,Bakker OJ,van SHC,et aI.Safety of cholecystectomy in the first 48 hours after admission for gallstone pancreatitis not yet proven[J]. Ann Surg,2011 ;253(5):1053-1054. 被引量:1
  • 9Schreurs WH, Vies W J, Stuif bergen WH, et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones leaving the gal I bladder in situ.Acohort study with longterm followup.Dis Surg,2004;21 (I):60-64. 被引量:1
  • 10Zhu QD,Tao CL,Zhou MT, et al.Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after common bile duct exploration for -holedocholithiasis[J].Langenbecks Arch Surg,2011 ;396( 1 ):53:62. 被引量:1

引证文献11

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部