摘要
利奥·施特劳斯是晚近十余年汉语政治哲学关注的焦点人物,他提出的现代性批判视角与复兴古典政治哲学的努力,已激起大量讨论。施氏同时给其政治哲学贴上"苏格拉底式"与"柏拉图式"的标签,然而,这师徒二人当年恰恰开启了政治哲学的两个相反路向。施特劳斯在两个路向之间的诸种艰苦游移及其最终隐在取向,便成为了一个极具思想史价值的经典个案。通过细致剖析此学案,我们可以进一步追索出政治哲学从其古希腊创基性时期到当代欧陆激进政治哲学之间的内在脉络。
Leo Strauss has occupied the focal point of Sinophone circles of political philosophy for over a decade. His critique of modernity and effort to resuscitate classical political philosophy has attracted heated discussions. Strauss labels his political philosophy as both'Socratic'and'Platonic. 'However,what Socrates and Plato have opened up are two opposite directions in political philosophy. Strauss' s subtle oscillation between these two directions is a case worthy of deep analysis. By virtue of such analysis,we are able to further trace the inner lineage from ancient Greek political philosophy to contemporary continental radical political philosophy.
出处
《华东师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第5期75-86,180,共12页
Journal of East China Normal University（Humanities and Social Sciences）
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"当代激进左翼政治哲学研究"(13CZX059)
上海市浦江人才项目"‘后结构主义’之后的政治哲学"(12PJC036)的阶段性成果
