摘要
体育联赛本土球员引发的社会问题是各国职业体育发展中的棘手问题。过去几年内,国际足联"6+5政策"和欧洲足联"本土球员政策"陆续出台,这些政策措施打着国籍配额的旗号,本质上却是保护主义。这种国家保护主义政策对足球运动管理权问题的争议,引发了欧洲足联和国际足联之间正在进行着"圈地战"。运用文献资料、逻辑推理等研究方法,从政策法学的视角,对国际足联"6+5政策"和欧洲足联"本土球员政策"进行了深入分析。研究认为:完全的国际转会自由是对球员和球迷最好的政策选择,而像配额制度这种国家保护主义政策会抑制足球运动发挥它的社会正能量。
The social problems caused by sports league players are a thorny problem in the development of professional sports in the world. In the past few years, the FIFA ＂6 ＋ 5 Policy＂ and UEFA ＂Mainland Player Policy＂ were enforced. Apparently they center on nationality quota. In fact,it is state protection. Disputes on administration authority have triggered the competition between FIFA and UEFA. By using literature, logical reasoning and other research methods, from a per- spective of policy law, this paper shows the analysis of the FIFA ＂6 ＋ 5 policy＂ and UEFA ＂players policy＂. Studies show that the total transfer of clubs is the best for players and fans. The state protection, such as quota system, would restrain the social power brought by football games.
出处
《沈阳体育学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第3期44-49,共6页
Journal of Shenyang Sport University
基金
国家社会科学基金项目:"体育与人的主体存在和全面发展研究"(13CTY001)
