摘要
主观明知是构成毒品犯罪的必需要件。相关司法解释也对如何运用客观证据来认定行为人的主观明知作了明确规定。通过对司法实务中典型案例的分析可知,运用司法解释规定来认定主观明知应当是间接证明而非推定,同样需要排除合理怀疑。一般来说,在判断主观明知问题时,可以从行为方式、时间地点、对价等几方面来增加对主观明知的确信,另一方面又要从行为人的年龄、阅历和交易习惯等方面来充分考虑行为人确受蒙骗的可能。对主观明知的认定需要综合全案证据,综合判断。
＂ Subjective knowing＂ is an essential condition for convicting drug-related crimes. The concerning judicial interpretation specifically stated how objective evidence shall be used to prove ＂subjective knowing＂. By case study, it is obvious that when applying judicial interpretation in defining ＂subjective knowing＂, circumstantial evidence rather than presumption shall be employed, and equally it needs to be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. Generally speaking, ＂subjective knowing＂ can be proved from the following aspects： behavioral pattern, time, place, consideration, etc.. On the other hand, the doer＇ s age, experiences, and transaction practices shall all be taken into consideration in case the doer was deceived. Finally, all the evidences shall be considered to achieve an synthetic judgment.
出处
《西南政法大学学报》
2014年第3期36-42,共7页
Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
毒品犯罪
主观明知
间接证据
证明
drug-related crime
subjective knowing
circumstantial evidence
prove
