摘要
目的:探讨HydrosunTM系统对ⅢB型慢性前列腺炎的疗效。方法:将62例前列腺炎患者随机分为观察组和对照组,各31例;观察组采用HydrosunTM系统进行治疗,对照组采用生物反馈进行治疗;比较两组患者治疗前后疼痛症状评分(CPSI-P)、排尿症状评分(CPSI-U)、前列腺症状总分(CPSI-T),以及治疗效果。结果:治疗前两组患者的CPSI-P、CPSI-U、CPSI-T组间比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。两组治疗后CPSI-P、CPSI-U、CPSI-T评分降低,与治疗前比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组治疗后的CPSI-P、CPSI-U、CPSI-T下降幅度明显高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者治疗的总有效率为87.10%,对照组总有效率为64.52%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:HydrosunTM系统对ⅢB型慢性前列腺炎治疗有较好的疗效。
To investigate the clinical effect of Hydrosun TM system in the treatment of chronic prostatitis （IIIB）.Methods：62 prostatitis patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 3 1 patients in each group.The patients in observation group were treated with HydrosunTM system,while those in control group were treated with biofeedback.Pain symptoms score （CPSI-P）,voiding symptom score （CPSI-U）and prostate symptom score （CPSI-T）before and after treatment were compared in the two groups as well as the effect of treatment.Results：The scores of CPSI-P,CPSI-U,CPSI-T in the two groups had no significant difference before treatment （P〉0.05）.The scores of CPSI-P,CPSI-U,CPSI-T were significantly lower than that before treatment in the two groups （P〈0.05）.The degree of decreasing with the scores of CPSI-P,CPSI-U,CPSI-T in observation group was higher than that in the control group after treatment （P〈0.05）;the total ef-fective rate of treatment in observation group was 87.10%,while the control group was 64.52%.There was signifi-cant difference between two groups （P〈0.05）.Conclusion：The HydrosunTMsystem has better curative effect on the treatment of chronic prostatitis IIIB.
出处
《中国性科学》
2014年第8期29-31,共3页
Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality
