期刊文献+

跨境电子商务交易全球性网上争议解决体系的构建 被引量:36

Establishment of On-line Global Dispute Resolution System for Cross-border E-commerce Transactions
原文传递
导出
摘要 互联网催生了跨境电子商务交易,但有效争议解决机制的缺乏严重影响了跨境电子商务的进一步发展,为此需要建立与跨境电子商务交易相匹配的有效争议解决机制——跨境电子商务交易全球性网上争议解决体系。建立跨境电子商务交易网上争议解决体系的尝试为全球性网上争议解决体系的构建提供了参考。网上争议程序的设计、适用法律以及争议解决结果的跨境执行是全球性网上争议解决体系需要解决的主要法律问题。全球性网上争议解决体系整体框架设计和法律问题的解决是全球性网上争议解决体系成败的关键。 The Internet has fostered cross-border e-commerce transactions, but the lack of an effective dispute resolution system hinders the further development of cross-border e-commerce, which calls for a competent on-line global dispute resolution system. The proposals for establishment of cross-border e-commerce dispute resolution system provide references for the construction of the global dispute resolution system. The design of on-line dispute resolution procedures, the governing law and the cross-border enforcement of dispute resolutions are principal legal issues facing the global on-line dispute resolution system. The design of global on-line dispute resolution system and the resolution of legal problems are key to the success of the on-line global dispute resolution system.
作者 薛源
出处 《国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期95-103,共9页 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
基金 2012年度中国法学会部级法学研究课题"电子商务交易网上争议解决体系构建研究"[CLS(2012)D206]的阶段性研究成果
关键词 跨境电子商务交易 全球性网上争议解决体系 网上争议解决机构 Cross-border e-commerce transactions On-line global dispute reso-lution system On-line dispute resolution bodies
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Colin Rule, Vikki Rogers and Louis Del Duca. Designing a Global Consumer Online Dispute Reso- lution (ODR) System for Cross-Border Small Value- High Volume Claims- OAS Developments [J]. Uni- form Commercial Code Law Journal, 2010, (3):227-228. 被引量:1
  • 2European Commission. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Online Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes (Regulation on consumer ODR) [R]. Brussels: EC, 2011. 被引量:1
  • 3Organization of American States. US Proposal to the OAS Seventh Inter-American Specialized Con-ference on Private International Law (CIDIP-VII)- Legislative Guidelines and Model Laws on Consumer Re- dress Mechanism [R]. Washington: OAS, 2010. 被引量:1
  • 4United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. Online Dispute Resolution for Cross-bor- der Electronic Commerce Transactions: Draft Procedural Rules - Proposal by the Governments of Colombia, Honduras, Kenya and the United States, (A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.125)[R]. New York: UNCITRAL, 2013. 被引量:1
  • 5United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. Online Dispute Resolution for Cross-bor- der Electronic Commerce Transactions: Draft Procedural Rules, (A/CN.9AVG.III/WP.123) [R]. New York: UNCITRAL, 2013. 被引量:1
  • 6United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. Online Dispute Resolution for Cross-bor- der Electronic Commerce Transactions: Draft Procedural Rules, (A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.123 /Add.1) [R]. New York: UNCITRAL, 2013. 被引量:1
  • 7United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. Online Dispute Resolution for Cross-bor- der Electronic Commerce Transactions: Draft Procedural Rules, (A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.127) [R]. New York: UNCITRAL,2014. 被引量:1
  • 8United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. Online Dispute Resolution for Cross-bor- der Electronic Commerce Transactions: Draft Procedural Rules, (A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.127 /Add.1) [R]. New York: UNCITRAL,2014. 被引量:1
  • 9United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. Online Dispute Resolution for Cross-bor- der Electronic Commerce Transactions: Draft Procedural Rules, (A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.119/Add.1) [R]. New York: UNCITRAL,2013. 被引量:1
  • 10United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. Online Dispute Resolution for Cross-bor- der Electronic Commerce Transactions: Issues for Consideration in the Conception of a Global ODR Frame- work, (A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.110) [R]. New York: UNCITRAL,2011. 被引量:1

同被引文献248

引证文献36

二级引证文献190

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部