期刊文献+

不同皮质骨厚度区域的加载正畸微种植体骨整合的组织形态学和生物力学分析 被引量:1

Histomorphometric and Biomechanical Analysis on the Osseointegration of Loaded Orthodontic Microscrews Inserted at Different Cortical Bone Thickness Sites
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究皮质骨厚度(CBT)对正畸微种植体骨整合的影响。方法选择四川大学实验动物中心的健康雄性成年Beagle犬12只,依据种植钉植入区皮质骨厚度分为厚CBT组与薄CBT组,将48枚微种植体植入12只Beagle犬两侧胫骨,厚CBT组与薄CBT组微种植体分别在距近中干骺端4 cm和2 cm处植入。术后1、3、5、7周处死,作力学拉拔测试和组织形态学研究。结果薄CBT组和厚CBT组1、3、5、7周CBT比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);在第1、3、5周,厚CBT组骨整合、皮质骨体积密度(骨体积/总体积)、相交表面(与骨表面接触的微种植体)均显著高于薄CBT组,第7周时两组间差异无统计学意义;厚CBT组最大拉拔力在1周达顶峰,3周降到最低点,薄CBT组则随时间延长持续上升。结论较大CBT对微种植体初期稳定性有益,而较薄皮质骨更有利于二期稳定性的获得。 Objective To evaluate the influence of different cortical bone thickness(CBT) sites on the osseointegration of loaded orthodontic microscrews. Methods A total of 12 healthy male adult beagles from Experimental Animal Center of Siehuan University were chosen. Forty-eight microscrews were inserted bilaterally in the tibias of 12 beagles, and divided into thick and thin CBT group. The distance between insertion site and proximal metaphyses of the thick CBT group was 4 cm, and that of the thin CBT group was 2 cm. After 1,3,5, and 7 weeks, the dogs were killed and their bone-screw specimens were prepared for microscopic computerized tomography(μCT) analysis and biomechanical pull-out testing. Results The CBT data was significantly different between the thick CBT and thin CBT group in week 1,3,5,7 ( P 〈 0. 05 ). In the thick CBT group,the indexes of OI,BV/TV ,IS were all significantly higher than those in thin CBT group in week 1,3,5 ,but the difference was not significant in week 7 after insertion. Fmax of microscrews in the thick CBT sites reached a peak in week 1 ,but dropped to the lowest level in week 3. And Fmax of the thin CBT group increased with the prolongation of time. Conclusion Relatively larger CBT is beneficial to the primary stability of the microserews,whereas thinner CBT is more appropriate for achieving long-term stability.
作者 付予乔
出处 《医学综述》 2014年第15期2820-2822,共3页 Medical Recapitulate
关键词 微种植体 皮质骨厚度 愈合时间 稳定性 骨整合 Microscrews Cortical bone thickness Healing time Stability Osseointegration
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Umemori M, Sugawara J, Mitani H, et al. Skeletal anchorage system for open-bite correction [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999,115(2) :166-174. 被引量:1
  • 2Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Kanomi R, et 02. The use of small titanium screws for orthodontic anchorage[ J]. J Dent Res ,2003,82 (5) :377-381. 被引量:1
  • 3Carano A, Velo S, Leone P, et al. Clinical applications of the minis- crew anchorage system[ J]. J Clin Orthod ,2005,39 (1) :9-24. 被引量:1
  • 4Cheng SJ ,Tseng IY, Lee JJ, et al. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage [ J ]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004, 19 ( 1 ) : 100-106. 被引量:1
  • 5Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, et al. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for ortho- dontic anchorage [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003,124 (4) :373-378. 被引量:1
  • 6Morarend C, Qian F, Marshall SD, et al. Effect of screw diameter on orthodontic skeletal anchorage [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009,136 ( 2 ) : 224-229. 被引量:1
  • 7Baumgaertel S. Cortical bone thickness and bone depth of the pos- terior palatal alveolar process for mini-implant insertion in adults [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2011,140(6) :806-811. 被引量:1
  • 8Lira JE, Lee SJ, Kim Y J, et al. Comparison of cortical bone thick- ness and mot proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement [ J ]. Orthod Craniofac Res,2009,12 (4) :299 -304. 被引量:1
  • 9Kang S, Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, et al. Bone thickness of the palate for or- thodontic mini-implant anchorage in adults [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dent- ofacial Orthop, 2007,131 (4 Suppl ) : S74-S81. 被引量:1
  • 10Miyamoto I, Tsuboi Y, Wada E, et al. Influence of cortical bone thickness and implant length on implant stability at the time of sur- gery-clinical, pi'ospoctive, biomechanical, and imaging study [ J ]. Bone,2005,37 (6) :776-780. 被引量:1

同被引文献24

  • 1罗小安,郑晓丹,林珊.前牙内收阶段不锈钢方丝摩擦力的变化[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2007,23(7):400-402. 被引量:2
  • 2ProffitWR.当代口腔正畸学[M].傅民魁,译.3版.北京:人民军医出叛社,2007:304-305. 被引量:7
  • 3Crismani AG,Bertl MH,Celar AG,et al. Miniscrews in orthodontic treat-ment :Review and analysis of published clinical trials [J]. Am J OrthodDentofacial Orthop,2010,137(1) : 108-113. 被引量:1
  • 4Moon CH,Lee DG ,Lee HS ,et al. Factors associated with the success rateof orthodontic miniscrews placed in the upper and lowerposterior buccalregion[J]. Angle Orthod,2008,78( 1) : 101-106. 被引量:1
  • 5Sung SJ,Jang GW, Chun YS,et al. Effective en-masse retraction designwith orthodontic mini-implant anchorage : a finite element analysis[J]. AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthod,2010,137(5):648-657. 被引量:1
  • 6刘海波,冯雪,吴晓雪,等.不同角度摇椅弓联合种植体支抗内收上牙列的三维有限元分析[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2012,47(增1):132-136. 被引量:2
  • 7Upadhyay M,Yadav S, Patil S. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse re-traction of maxillary anterior teeth : a clinical cephalometric study [J]. Am JOrthod Dentofacial Orthp’2008,134(6):803-810. 被引量:1
  • 8Park HS,Yoon DY,Park CS,et al. Treatment effects and anchorage poten-tial of sliding mechanics with titanium screws compared with the Tweed-Merrifield technique[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2006,133 (4):593-600. 被引量:1
  • 9Mimura H. Treatment of severe bimaxillary protrusion with miniscrew an-chorage :treatmentand complications[J]. Aust Orthod J ,2008,24(2): 156-163. 被引量:1
  • 10Asscherickx K, Vannet BV,Wehrbein H,et al. Root repair after injury frommini-screw[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res,2005,16(5) :575-578. 被引量:1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部