期刊文献+

腹腔镜手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的疗效观察 被引量:1

Methods and curative effect of laparoscopic operation in the treatment of adhesive intestinal obstruction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨使用腹腔镜手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的效果。方法选取2008年6月~2013年4月收治的粘连性肠梗阻患者88例,随机分为试验组与对照组,试验组45例患者实施腹腔镜手术治疗,对照组43例患者实施传统开腹手术治疗,对比观察两组患者临床效果。结果试验组手术时间、术中出血量明显较少,术后排气及住院时间较短,术后需要镇痛及并发症、再梗阻发生率较低,与对照组相比P<0.05,差异有统计学意义。结论腹腔镜肠粘连松解术是治疗粘连性肠梗阻的有效腹腔镜术式,与传统开腹术式相比,其手术时间、术中出血较少,风险低,对患者机体扰乱小,术后恢复较快,且明显降低了术后镇痛及并发症发生,具有更为理想的临床疗效。 Objective To explore the clinical treatment of adhesive intestinal obstruction in the use of laparoscopic operation, compare d with traditional open operationand observe its therapeutic effect. Methods 88 cases patients in our hospital from June 2010 to April 2013 were randomly divided into experimental group and control group.The experimental group received laparoscopic operation, the control group received traditional open operation, and observed its clinical effect. Results The experimental group operation time, amount of bleeding during operation, postoperative ambulation and hospital stay was significantly less, and the rate of analgesia, obstruction and complications were low. Compared with the control group, P〈0.05, the difference had statistical significance. Conclusion Compared to the traditional open surgery, Laparoscopic enterolysis has lower risk, faster postoperative recovery, less complications and postoperative analgesia.
作者 田国标
出处 《中国处方药》 2014年第4期16-17,共2页 Journal of China Prescription Drug
关键词 腹腔镜 传统开腹 肠粘连松解术 粘连性肠梗阻 Laparoscopy Laparotomy Intestinal adhesions Adhesive intestinal obstruction
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献24

  • 1李一民,武小宪,任武军,王永兴.腹腔镜在小肠梗阻手术中的应用[J].华北国防医药,2005,17(5):322-323. 被引量:4
  • 2瞿明.腹腔镜在肠粘连松解术中的应用[J].实用临床医学(江西),2006,7(9):85-86. 被引量:9
  • 3Slim K. Laparoscopic treatment of small intestine obstructi [ J ]. Chirurgie,1999,124(2) :177-181. 被引量:1
  • 4LI Jingdong.Prevention and treatment of laparoscopic surgery and adherence of abdominal cavity[J].China Journal of Endoscopy,2005,8(1):30. 被引量:1
  • 5Wu Zhiming,LOU Jianping,MENG Xingcheng,et al.Laparoscopic enterodialysis versus open entreodialysis:A comparison study[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2007,4(1):41. 被引量:1
  • 6Ellis H. The clinical significance of adhesions focus on intestinal obstruction. EurJ Surg Suppl, 1997, (557): 5-9. 被引量:1
  • 7DuronJ J, du Montcel ST, Berger A, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of mortality and morbidity after operation for adhesive postoperative small of small bowel obstruction. AmJ Surg, 2008,195(6): 726-734. 被引量:1
  • 8Ghosheh B, SalamehJR. Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: review of 1061 cases. Surg Endosc, 2007,21 (11): 1945-1949. 被引量:1
  • 9Tittel A, Treutner KH, Titkova S, et al. Comparison of adhesion reformation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis in an animal model. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2001, 386(2): 141-145. 被引量:1
  • 10Okamoto H, Wakana H, Kawashima K, et al. Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic adhesiolysis for mechanical small bowel obstruction. AsianJ Endosc Surg, 2012,5(2) :53-58. 被引量:1

共引文献155

同被引文献32

引证文献1

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部