期刊文献+

基于GIS与Logistic模型的公路泥石流易发性分析 被引量:12

Evaluation Method of Debris-flow Susceptibility Using GIS and Logistic Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析了泥石流形成与演化的物质条件、能量条件和环境条件。选取坡度、高程、坡面粗糙度、地层岩性、距断裂距离、地震烈度、土地利用类型作为泥石流易发性评价因子,引入Logistic回归分析方法,建立了泥石流易发性分析模型。定量分析了G318川藏公路段泥石流易发性,结果表明,该公路全线大部分处于泥石流中高易发区,其中,高易发区与中易发区占总面积的78.61%,主要分布在大渡河、澜沧江、金沙江、怒江、帕隆藏布江等大江大河的峡谷区段,这些地区在公路修复和规划重建中应做好泥石流的预测、预报及防治。 The formation conditions of debris flow were analyzed and the seven key indexes of hill slope, elevation, hill surface roughness, rock stratum, distance to faults, seismic intensity of earthquake and land use type were chosen for evaluating the susceptibility of debris flow. A model of debris flow susceptibility was established by introducing logistic regression, and the evaluation and mapping of debris flow susceptibility were comple- ted for the highways. Subsequently, this proposed method was applied in a case study carried out on the Sichuan--Tibet section of national highway G318. Analysis of debris flow susceptibility for the whole highway showed that 78.61% of the total study area was situated in debris flow-prone areas, including the canyon areas of Dadu, Lanchang, Jinsha, Nu and Palongzangbu Rivers. It is suggested that sufficient attentions should be paid in debris flow forecast and prevention in road reconstruction and line selection for new highway.
出处 《水土保持通报》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期185-189,共5页 Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation
基金 四川省科技支撑计划项目"川藏交通干线四川段泥石流灾害风险评估研究"(2012SZ0075) 中国科学院"西部之光"人才培养计划项目"川藏交通干线泥石流灾害风险评估"(Y3R2440440)
关键词 泥石流 易发性 LOGISTIC模型 公路安全 debris flow susceptibility Logistic model highway safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1唐邦兴,柳素清,刘世建.中国泥石流分布及其灾害危险区划图[M].成都:成都地图出版社,1991. 被引量:1
  • 2崔鹏,陈晓清,程尊兰,陈宁生,党超.西藏泥石流滑坡监测与防治[J].自然杂志,2010,32(1):19-25. 被引量:26
  • 3Carrara A. Multivariate models for landslide hazard evalua tion[J]. Mathematical Geology, 1983,15 (3) : 403-426. 被引量:1
  • 4Montgomery D R, Dietrich W E. A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding [J]. Water Resource Research, 1994,30(4) :1157-1171. 被引量:1
  • 5Chung C F, Fabbri A G. Probabilistic Prediction models for landslide hazard mapping[J]. Photogrammetric Engineering Remote Sensing, 1999,65(12) : 1388-1399. 被引量:1
  • 6Cascini L. Applicability of landslide susceptibility and hazard zoning at different scales[J]. Engineering Geolo- gy, 2008,102(3) :164-177. 被引量:1
  • 7Rapolla A, Nocera S D, Matano F, et al. Susceptibility regional zonation of earthquake-induced landslides in Campania, Southern Italy[J]. Natural Hazards, 2012, 61(1) :115-126. 被引量:1
  • 8唐川.云南怒江流域泥石流敏感性空间分析[J].地理研究,2005,24(2):178-185. 被引量:43
  • 9邹强,崔鹏,张建强,向灵芝.长江上游地区泥石流灾害敏感性量化评价研究[J].环境科学与技术,2012,35(3):159-163. 被引量:8
  • 10罗德富 毛济周.川藏公路南线(西藏境内)山地灾害及防治对策[M].北京:科学出版社,1995.3-6. 被引量:23

二级参考文献88

共引文献369

同被引文献183

引证文献12

二级引证文献199

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部