摘要
20世纪前期,天灾人祸的宿县已成"恶土"。赛珍珠诺贝尔奖作品《大地》对淮北农民疾苦的叙事具有强烈的现实性,从而获得很多赞许。但是赛珍珠客观上缺乏对"恶土"背后社会因素的分析,也招致较多批评和指责。在20世纪二三十年代中国农村社会性质大论战中,围绕同一部作品学术价值而展开激烈争论是普遍的现象。赛珍珠及其作品《大地》,因为特殊的身份背景和巨大的影响力,成为这种普遍现象的一种典型代表。
The early 20th century, natural and man - made disasters made Su County become ＂hard earth＂. It had a strong sense of reality that Pearl S. Buck narrated miseries of farmers in north of Huai River in Nobel Prize works ＂Good Earth＂, and has gotten a lot of praise. But Pearl Buck objectively didnt analyze the social factors behind ＂bad soil＂, and leaded to more criticisms and accusations. In the great debate about China＇s rural social nature of 1920s and 1930s, that the fierce debate about the academic value of a same works was a common phenomenon. Pearl Buck and her works ＂Good Earth＂ because of the special status background and huge influence, became a typical representative of this widespread phenomenon.
出处
《兰州学刊》
CSSCI
2014年第6期53-57,共5页
基金
2013年度国家社科青年基金项目(项目编号:13CZS034)
2013年度安徽省教育厅人文社科项目(项目编号:SK2013B064)的阶段性成果
关键词
赛珍珠
《大地》
宿县
Pearl S. Buck
good earth
su county
