期刊文献+

封堵取石导管联合钬激光治疗输尿管结石的对比研究 被引量:8

Comparative study of ureteral occlusion device combined with ureteroscopic holium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral calculi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估英诺伟TMIVX-SC10封堵取石导管在输尿管镜取石术中应用的有效性及安全性。方法:2013年1月至8月于我院就诊的单侧输尿管结石并行输尿管镜检患者299例,随机分为2组,应用封堵取石导管141例(A组),未应用158例(B组)。比较2组患者的碎石成功率、结石清除率、手术时间、手术并发症发生率。结果:2组的总体碎石成功率相当,A组为90.1%,B组为82.3%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.053);对输尿管上段结石A组为81.6%,B组为62%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.046);对输尿管中下段结石的成功率2组比较无统计学意义(P=1.000,0.59);对成功施行输尿管镜碎石的例数中A组的平均手术时间为(36.2±13.4)min,B组为(44.9±28.7)min,差异有统计学意义(P=0.002);上段结石A组的手术时间为(39.2±12.0)min,B组为(53.3±26.2)min,差异有统计意义(P=0.010);中段结石A组的手术时间为(43.0±14.1)min,B组为(45.3±20)min,差异无统计意义(P=0.754);下段结石A组的手术时间为(34.1±13.6)min,B组为(41.1±28.5)min,差异有统计意义(P=0.047);A组输尿管上段的结石的清除率为96.8%,B组为80.6%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.104);中下段结石2组比较无明显差异(P=1.000,0.479)。2组并发症发生率比较无统计学差异。结论:使用结石封堵取石导管能显著提高输尿管上段结石经输尿管镜碎石的成功率,能显著缩短输尿管镜碎石术的手术时间。 Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of INNOVEX TMIVX-SC10 ureteral occlusion device in the ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy. Methods:Totally 299 patients with unilateral ureteral calculi from January 2013 to August 2013were enrolled in this study. They were randomly divided into 2 groups,group A(141 cases)applying ureteral occlusion device and group B(158 cases)not applying ureteral occlusion device during ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy. The success rate,calculus elimination rate,average operation time and complications were compared. Results:There was no statistically significant difference in overall calculi free rate between group A(90.1%)and group B(82.3%)(P=0.053). There were statistically significant differences in calculi free rate for upper urethral calculi between group A(81.6%)and group B(62.0%)(P=0.046),but there was no difference for lower urethral calculi between two groups(P=1.000,0.590). Average operation time of success cases were(36.2±13.4) min and(44.9±28.7)min with statically differences between two groups(P=0.002). Average operation time of upper ureteral calculi stone were(39.2±12.0)min and(53.3±26.2)min with statically differences between two groups(P=0.010). Average operation time of middle urethral calculi were(43.0±14.1)min and(45.3±20.0)min with statically differences between two groups(P=0.754). Average operation time of lower ureteral calculi were(34.1±13.6)min and(41.1±28.5)min with statically differences between two groups(P=0.047). Calculi free rates for upper urethral calculi in two groups were 96.8% and 80.6%,without statistically significant difference(P=0.104)and no statistically significant difference was found in calculi free rates for middle and lower ureteral calculi between two groups(P=1.000,0.479). There was no difference in complication incidence between two groups. Conclusion:Ureteral occlusion device can significantly increase s
出处 《重庆医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期824-827,共4页 Journal of Chongqing Medical University
关键词 封堵取石导管 输尿管镜 钬激光 输尿管结石 结石漂移 ureteral occlusion device ureterscopy holmium laser ureteral calculi calculi migration
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献27

  • 1黄宏,林美霞,唐华,陈剑,黄世勇.输尿管镜下套石网篮配合气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石[J].中国基层医药,2006,13(11):1817-1819. 被引量:12
  • 2Dretler S P. Ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral cal- culi: Prevention of stone migration[J]. J Endourol, 2000,14:565-567. 被引量:1
  • 3Pauletter H G, Sameer S K, Perry K T, et al. As- sessment of novel ureteral occlusion device and com- parison with stone cone in prevention of stone frag- ment migration during lithotripsy[J]. J Endourol, 2005,19 : 200- 203. 被引量:1
  • 4Ahmed M, Pedro R N, Kieley S,et al. Systematic e- valuation of ureteral occlusion devices: insertion, de -ployment, stone migration, and extraction[J]. Urol- ogy,2009,73 : 976-980. 被引量:1
  • 5Pedro R, Hendlin K, Weiland D, etal. In vitro eval- uation of ureteral perforation forces [J]. Urology, 2007,70:592-594. 被引量:1
  • 6Teichman J M ,Rao R D, Rogenes V J, et al. Uret- eroseopic management of ureteral calculi: electro- hydraulic verses holmium : YAG lithotripsy[J]. J Urol, 1997,58 : 1357- 1361. 被引量:1
  • 7White M D, Moran M E, Catvano C J, etal. Evalua- tion of retropulsion caused by holmium: YAG laser with various power settings and fibers[J]. J Endou- roi, 1998,12:183-186. 被引量:1
  • 8Lee H, Ryan T, Teichman J M, et al. Stone retro- pulsion during holmium : YAG lithotripsy[J]. J Urol, 2003,169 :881 - 885. 被引量:1
  • 9Delvecchio F C, Kuo R L, Preminger G M. Clinical efficacy of combined lithoclast and I.ithovac stone re- moval during ureteroscopy[J]. J Urol,2000,164:40 -42. 被引量:1
  • 10陈小刚,张青汉,董能本,叶绪龙,潘卫斌,彭伟.微创经皮肾穿刺碎石术和经尿道输尿管镜下碎石术治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(8):614-615. 被引量:8

共引文献83

同被引文献91

  • 1贺磊磊,郑佐柱,郑国有.输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗老年输尿管结石围术期的管理及疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(8):2278-2279. 被引量:14
  • 2毕晶,胥朝晖.超声对输尿管结石的诊断价值及临床意义[J].中国实用内科杂志,2013,33(S1):128-129. 被引量:5
  • 3Ghani KR, Wolf JS. What is the stone-free rate following flexi- ble ureteroscopy for kidney stones[J]. Nat Rev Urol, 2015, 12(5): 281-288. 被引量:1
  • 4Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, et al. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi[J]. J Urol, 2007, 178(6): 2418-2434. 被引量:1
  • 5Desai MR, Patel SB, Desai MM, et al. The Dretler stone eone:a device to prevent ureteral stone migration-the initial clinical ex- perience[J]. J Urol, 2002, 167: 1985-1988. 被引量:1
  • 6Ahmed M, Pedro RN, Kieley S, et al. Systematic evaluation of ureteral occlusion. devices: Insertion, deployment, stone migration, and extraction[J]. Urology, 2009, 73(5): 976-980. 被引量:1
  • 7Ding H, Wang Z, Du W, et al. NTrap in Prevention of stone migration during ureteroscopic hthotripsy for proximal ure~eral stones: a meta-analysis[J]. J Endourol, 2012, 26(2): 130-134. 被引量:1
  • 8Holley PG, Sharma SK, Perry KT, et al. Assessment of novel ureteral occlusion device and comparison with Stone Cone in prevention of stone fragment migration during lithotripsy[J]. J En- dourol, 2005, 19(2): 200-203. 被引量:1
  • 9Delvecchio FC, Kuo RL, Preminger GM. clinical efficacy of Combined lithoclast and Lithovac stone removal during m'eteroscopy[J]. J Urol, 2000, 164(1): 40-42. 被引量:1
  • 10Desai MR, Patel SB, Desai MM, et at. The Dretler stone cone: A device to prevent ureteral stone migration-the initial clinical experience[J]. J Urol, 2002, 167(5): 1985-1988. . 被引量:1

引证文献8

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部