期刊文献+

检测尿液脂阿拉伯甘露聚糖对结核病诊断价值的荟萃分析 被引量:2

Value of Urine Lipoarabinomannan in Diagnosis of Tuberculosis:a Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的荟萃分析检测尿液脂阿拉伯甘露聚糖(LAM)对结核病的诊断价值。方法收集有关研究检测尿液LAM诊断结核病的文献,计算纳入研究的合并敏感度、特异度等指标,绘制综合受试者工作特征曲线并计算曲线下面积。结果共纳入12篇文献,LAM诊断结核病的合并敏感度为0.53,95%可信区间(CI)为(0.51,0.56);合并特异度为0.91,95%CI为(0.90,0.92);合并阳性似然比为6.28,95%CI为(4.11,9.61),合并阴性似然比为0.50,95%CI为(0.36,0.69);合并诊断优势比为14.84,95%CI为(7.94,27.74)。SROC曲线下面积为0.85。结论检测尿液LAM对结核病具有一定的诊断价值,可作为重要的结核病诊断指标。 Objective To evaluate the value of urine lipoarabinomannan (LAM) assay in diagnosis of tuberculo-sis. Methods Papers of urine LAM assay in diagnosis of tuberculosis were collected. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and other diagnostic indexes in the study were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was drawn, and the area under the curve was also calculated. Results Twelve research papers were included in the meta-a-nalysis. The pooled sensitivity of urine LAM assay in diagnosis of tuberculosis was 0. 53, and 95℅ confidence interval (CI) was 0. 51 -0. 56; pooled specificity was 0. 91, and 95℅ CI was 0. 90 -0. 92; positive likelihood ratio was 6. 28 with 4. 11 -9. 61 of 95℅ CI, while negative likelihood ratio was 0. 50 with 0. 36 - 0. 69 of 95℅ CI; diagnostic odds ratio was 14. 84 with 7. 94 -27. 74 of 95℅ CI. The area under the curve of SROC was 0. 85. Conclusion Urine lipoarabinomannan assay plays a certain role in diagnosis of tuberculosis, and may be a useful important diagnostic index for tuberculosis.
出处 《解放军医药杂志》 CAS 2014年第7期91-94,共4页 Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal of Chinese People’s Liberation Army
关键词 尿 脂阿拉伯甘露聚糖 结核 META 分析 Urine Lipoarabinomannan Tuberculosis Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献70

共引文献27

同被引文献39

  • 1Chu H, Cole SR.Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach[J].J Clin Epidemiol, 2006, 59(12) : 1331 - 1332; author reply 1332 -1333. 被引量:1
  • 2Reitsma JB, Glas AS,Rutjes AW,et al.Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews[ J ].J Clin Epidemiol, 2005,58( 10) : 982 -990. 被引量:1
  • 3Harbord RM, Whiting P, Sterne JA, et al.An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary [ J ].J Clin Epidemiol, 2008, 61(11): 1095 -1103. 被引量:1
  • 4Naaktgeboren CA, van Enst WA, Ochodo EA, et al.Systematic overview finds variation in approaches to investigating and reporting on sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies[ J].J Clin Epidemiol,2014,67( 11) : 1200 - 1209. 被引量:1
  • 5Macaskill P, Gatsonis C, Deeks JJ, et al.Analysing and presenting results [ S/OL]//Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Gatsonis C.Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 1.0.The Cochrane Collaboration, 2010.( 2010-12-23 ) [2014-09-26].http ://srdta.cochrane.org/. 被引量:1
  • 6Deeks JJ.Systematic reviews in health care; systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests[ J].BMJ,2001,323 (7305) : 157 -162. 被引量:1
  • 7祝慧萍,方龙,夏欣,林嵩艺,宇传华.双变量模型在诊断试验Meta分析中的应用[J].华中科技大学学报(医学版),2010,39(1):78-81. 被引量:10
  • 8周田华,汤逊,苏踊跃,王毅,黄游,殴校冉,徐永清.经后路全脊椎切除治疗结核治愈型胸腰椎角状后凸畸形[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2014,24(1):53-57. 被引量:13
  • 9张晶,王宇娟,霍俊玲,王赞宏.人附睾蛋白4早期诊断子宫内膜癌价值的系统评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2014,14(1):72-78. 被引量:8
  • 10张晓光,张小利,帕丽达.帕尔哈提,张雨,娜迪热.铁列吾汗.超声造影对乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别诊断价值的系统评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2014,14(1):79-84. 被引量:7

引证文献2

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部