摘要
我国2012年《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第二百条规定,有新的证据,足以推翻原判决、裁定的,可以作为当事人申请再审之理由。但对于如何理解此"新的证据"尚无明确定论,学界与实务中仍需探究。本文拟通过对于作为再审事由的"新的证据"的要件构成进行分析梳理,防止适用中的混淆,为司法实践提供一定的指引。
The Civil Procedure Law of the People＇s Republic of China（ adopted in 2012） prescribes in Article 200that retrial occurs when there is new evidence sufficient to set aside the original judgment or written order. However,it stops short of presenting a definitive interpretaion of the so-called ＂new evidence＂,which renders necessary further investigations in both theoretical and practical terms. This paper analyzes and straightens out the constituent elements of ＂new evidence＂cited as a warrant for case retrials with a view to dispelling likely confusions in the application of such new evidence,thereby providing some guidance in China＇s judicial practices.
出处
《南阳师范学院学报》
CAS
2014年第7期10-14,18,共6页
Journal of Nanyang Normal University
关键词
新的证据
新发现
新形成
要件
new evidence
new findings
new formation
constituent
