摘要
[目的]分析维文版EORTC QLQ-C30(V3)生命质量量表、维文版QLICP-GM(V1.0)量表的信度和效度。[方法]将EORTC QLQ-C30(V3)生命质量量表、我国自主研制的中文版QLICPGM(V1.0)量表进行翻译、回译及部分文化调适后分别产生维文量表,分别对497例在新疆维吾尔自治区肿瘤医院住院确诊的恶性肿瘤患者进行问卷调查,分析量表的内部一致性、重测信度、内容效度、区分效度和结构效度等指标。[结果]QLICP-GM量表的内部一致性优于EORTC QLQ-C30量表,但重测信度不如EORTC QLQ-C30量表。QLICP-GM量表的内容效度、区分效度均优于EORTC QLQ-C30量表。[结论]维文版QLICP-GM量表具有良好的信度和效度,更适合应用于新疆公共卫生和其它医学领域。
[ Purpose] To investigate the validity and reliability of Uyghur EORTC QLQ-C30（V3）and QI,ICP-GM（VI.0）. [Methods] Uyghur questionnaire which been translated and back-translated and adjt,sted with culture from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLICP-GM（V1.0）quality of life scale. A total c^f 497 cancer patients were investigated by the Uyghur questionnaire. Cronbachs＇ Alpha coefficient, retest reliability,c＇ontent validity,discriminatory validity and construct validity were analyzed. [Resuhsl Internal consistency of Uyghur QLICP-GM was superior to Uyghur EORTC QLQ-C30,but test- retest reliability of Uyghur QLICP-GM was inferior to Uyghur EORTC QLQ-C30. Content validity QIACP-GM scahes,discriminant validity were superior to EORTC QLQ-C30. [Conclusion] The Uyghur QLICP-GM quality of life scale has good reliability and validity,and is more suitable for the Xinjiang Public Heahh anti other medical fields.
出处
《中国肿瘤》
CAS
2014年第7期574-579,共6页
China Cancer
基金
新疆维吾尔自治区卫生厅青年科技人才专项科研基金(2007Y38)
