摘要
文学史概念有“原始形态文学史”与“知识形态文学史”之分;所谓“文学史观念”,系指后者在处理前者时所确立的一种基本的文化理念、思路、视角或方法等,其中涉及到对前者的内容的倾向性认识,则可视之为“文学史次观念”。次观念之一的“风貌文学史”观念,当是对知识形态文学史的学术文化目标的基本定位;另一更具方法论色彩的次观念即“比例尺意识”,则有助于把握一种评判原始形态文学史现象的价值标准的分寸感。这两者均建立在“计量史学”的原理上,所以在文学史研究工作中有必要引入“计量史学”的方法。
The ideology of literary history can be divided into 'raw literary history' and 'intellectual (processed) literary history'. By 'ideology of literary history' we mean the fundamental cultural attitudes, approaches, perspectives, methods, etc. , with which we analyze the 'raw literary history' in the research framework of the 'processed literary history'. This involves the evaluation tendencies towards the content of 'raw literary history'. We call it 'sub-ideology of literary history'. The sub-ideology boils down to two essential methods: one is 'functional literary historiography', which defines the basic academic and cultural goals of the intellectual literary history; another is the typical notion of 'evaluation-scale awareness', on which the assessment of the values of literary history is based. Both of them hinge on the principle of 'quantitative history'. Therefore, the method of quantitative history is indispensable to the research of literary history.
出处
《中山大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2002年第3期29-38,共10页
Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
文学史观念
文学史次观念
风貌文学史
比例尺意识
计量史学
ideology of literary history
sub-ideology of literary history
functional literary history
evaluation-scale consciousness
quantitative history
