期刊文献+

自行设计腹膜炎评分的临床应用 被引量:4

Clinical application of self-designed peritonitis scoring.
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价自行设计腹膜炎评分方法的合理性和安全性。方法 对 4 0 5例继发性腹膜炎 (SP)急诊手术同时应用自行设计的腹膜炎评分和APACHEⅡ评分 ,比较二者之间的相关性。根据腹膜炎评分 ,≤ 6分病例 (A组 )仅予术前单剂预防性抗生素 ,术后不用抗生素 ;≥ 7分病例 (B、C组 )除术前预防性应用抗生素以外 ,术后还治疗性应用抗生素 ;比较两组病例的术后并发症发生率和病死率 ,显著性差异比较用 χ2 检验。结果  4 0 5例SP病例的腹膜炎评分和APACHEⅡ评分呈明显线性正相关 (r =0 89,P <0 0 1)。SP术后特异性并发症发生率和病死率均随腹膜炎评分增加而上升 ,A组术后腹腔残余感染率和病死率均为 0。结论 自行设计的腹膜炎评分能准确判断SP病例的严重程度。根据此评分方法进行规范化抗生素治疗 ,免除了轻症SP术后的不必要用药 ,但不增加其并发症发生率和病死率 ,具有合理、简便、安全、可靠等优点。 Objective\ To evaluate the rationality and security of self-designed peritonitis scoring method.Methods\ The peritonitis scoring and APACHEⅡ scoring were used concurrently in 405 patients with secondary peritonitis who underwent emergent laparotomy,and the results and clinical outcomes were compared between them.According to the peritonitis scoring,the cases in which the scoring ≤6 were given a single-dose prophylactic antibiotic before emergent laparotomy and none postoperatively,the cases in which the scoring ≥7 were given prophylactic antibiotic preoperatively and therapeutic antibiotic postoperatively.The incidence of the complications and the mortality were compared between them,and the statistical difference was evaluated by χ 2 test.Results\ In the 405 cases,there was significant positive linear relativity between the peritonitis scoring and APACHEⅡ scoring.The incidence of the special complications and the mortality after laparotomy were increased with the elevation of the peritonitis scoring.In the cases with the scoring ≤6,the incidence of the intra-abdominal remainder infection and the mortality after laparotomy were all 0 Conclusion\ The self-designed peritonitis scoring can predict exactly the severity of the cases with secondary peritonitis.According to this scoring method,we can carry through the canonical antibiotic therapy,avoid the useless therapeutic antibiotic after operation of the cases with secondary peritonitis in which the peritonitis scoring ≤6 (which was 40 32% of the 405 cases).It doesn't increase the incidence of the special complications and the mortality after emergent laparotomy of the cases with secondary peritonitis,and it is a rational,covenient,secure and reliable peritonitis scoring method.
出处 《中国实用外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2002年第6期349-352,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery
关键词 临床应用 继发性腹膜炎 评分 抗生素 SP 手术方法 Secondary peritonitis\ Scoring\ Antibiotic
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献10

同被引文献33

  • 1邵永胜,彭开勤,张应天.急腹症外科急诊手术围手术期的液体治疗[J].临床外科杂志,1994,2(2):92-94. 被引量:8
  • 2Hau T.Biology and treatment of peritionitis:the historic development of current concepts.J Am Coil Surg,1998,186:475-479. 被引量:1
  • 3Hau T. Biology and treatment of peritionitis: the historic development of current concepts. J Am Coll Surg, 1998,186: 475-479. 被引量:1
  • 4American committee of chest physicians/society of critical care medicine consensus conference committee. ACCP/SCCM consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and multiple organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit C 被引量:1
  • 5Lucs CE. Resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock. In:Ivatury RR, eds. Penetrating trauma. New York: Willianms Wilkins, 1996. 183-194. 被引量:1
  • 6刘中民.危重病人的血浆胶体渗透压与液体复苏[J].中国急救医学,1985,5(4):24-29. 被引量:1
  • 7Knaus WA,Draper EA,Wagner DP,et al.APACHE Ⅱ:A severity of disease classification system.Crit Care Med,1985,13:818-829. 被引量:1
  • 8Nystrom PO,Bax R,Dellinger EP,et al.Proposed definitions for diagnosis,severity scoring,stratification and outcome for trials on intraabdominal infection.World J Surg,1990,14:148-158. 被引量:1
  • 9Bosscha K,Reijnders K,Hulstaert PF,et al.Prognostic scoring systems to predict outcome in peritonitis and intraabdominal sepsis.Br J Surg,1997,84:1532-1534. 被引量:1
  • 10Koperna T,Schulz F.Relaparotomy in peritonitis:Prognosis and treatment of patient with persisting intrabdominal infection.World J Surg,2000,24:32-37. 被引量:1

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部