期刊文献+

几种除草剂和助剂对苜蓿Medicago sative出苗和生长的影响 被引量:14

Response of Seedling Alfalfa ( Medicago sative ) to Various Herbicides Applied alone or in Combination with Adjuvants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在温室条件下研究了几种苗前除草剂单用或混用对苜蓿出苗和生长的影响 ,以及不同叶龄苜蓿对苗后除草剂的反应及添加助剂对药效的影响。结果表明 :咪唑乙烟酸在6 0~ 12 0 g/hm2 剂量下 ,于苗前施用 ,对苜蓿出苗和幼苗生长都有明显的抑制作用。咪唑乙烟酸(30 g/hm2 )与二甲戊灵 (495 g/hm2 )混用 ,对苜蓿的药害显著降低。苗后施用除草剂对苜蓿的安全性与叶龄密切相关。咪唑乙烟酸以 30~ 6 0 g/hm2 剂量在苜蓿 3叶期施用 ,对苜蓿安全 ;在12 0 g/hm2 用量下 ,对 5叶期的苜蓿无明显药害。乳氟禾草灵 (130~ 2 6 0 g/hm2 )和丙炔氟草胺(75~ 15 0 g/hm2 )无论是 3叶期还是 5叶期施用 ,对苜蓿幼苗都有严重的药害。与咪唑乙烟酸单用时比较 ,药液中添加 1.0 m L /L的平平加 - 15和 AM- 10 0及 5 .0 m L /L的 SDP。 Glasshouse experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of pre and post herbicides on alfala ( Medicago sativa ) and addition of adjuvants on the performance of imazethapyr. Results indicated that imazethapyr applied pre emergence at 60 120 g/hm 2 resulted in significant injury to alfalfa both on emergence and on seedling growing. When applied in combination with pendimethalin (495 g/hm 2), the injury decreased greatly. The safety of post emergence herbicides closely related with growth stage of alfalfa. Imazethapyr at 120 g/hm 2 was excellently safe to alfalfa at 5 leaf stage and seriously damage at 3 leaf stage, and benazolin ethyl applied post emergence at 225~450 g/hm 2 was safe only after alfalfa 5 leaf stage. Growth of alfalfa was not damaged by addition of nonionic adjuvant PPJ 15, Am 100 or DPS in imazethapyr solution.
出处 《农药学学报》 CAS CSCD 2002年第1期52-57,共6页 Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science
基金 北京市科委重点资助项目 (2 0 0 0 0 0 2 72 )
关键词 除草剂 助剂 苜蓿 MEDICAGO sative 出苗 生长 影响 alfalfa herbicide adjuvant
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Hall M S,Curran W S,Werner E L,et al.Evaluation of weed control practices during spring and summer alfalfa establishment [J].J Prod Agric,1995,8:360-365. 被引量:1
  • 2Marten G C,Andersen R N.Forage nutritive value and palatability of 12 common annual weeds [J].Crop Sci,1975,15:821-827. 被引量:1
  • 3Moyer J R.Effect of weed control and a companion crop on alfalfa and sainfoin establishment,yield and nutrient composition [J].Can J Plant Sci,1985,65:107-116. 被引量:1
  • 4Temme D G,Harvey R G,Fawcett R S,et al.Effects of annual weed control on alfalfa forage quality [J].Agron J,1979,71:51-54. 被引量:1
  • 5Peregine E K,Norris R F.Environmental modification of seedling alfalfa,(Medicao sativa),tolerence to bromoxynil [J].Weed Sci,1988,36:671-677. 被引量:1
  • 6Curran W S,Hall M H,Werner E L.Effect of varying imazethapyr application rate and timing on yield of seedling grass-alfalfa mixtures[J].J Prod Agric,1999,12(2):244-248. 被引量:1
  • 7Foy C L.Adjuvants for Agrichemicals [M].London:CRC Press,1992.433-440. 被引量:1
  • 8Wilson R G.Effect of imazethapyr on perennial grasses [J].Weed Technol,1995,9:187-191. 被引量:1
  • 9Wu J Y,Dastgheib F.Effects of various herbicides and surfactants on Mallow (Malva spp) [A].Proceeding II of 18th Asia-Pacific Weed Science Congress [C].Beijing:2001.589-593. 被引量:1
  • 10Rick F.Weed Control Manual [M].Meister Publishing Company,1998.482-483. 被引量:1

同被引文献192

引证文献14

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部