摘要
法律修辞是一种不同于道德修辞、文学修辞、政治修辞等其他修辞类型的特殊修辞,但由于人们对其特殊性重视不够,实践中混淆法律修辞与其他修辞类型的做法大量存在。从司法视角考察,不同于亚里士多德和伯克的修辞认知,法律修辞是指司法活动参与者有助于法律效果实现的修辞活动,包括言语和行为。界定法律修辞的特性需要遵循实然和应然两个层面的标准:一、有助于正确区分不同修辞类型,防止其他修辞类型的权力异化和思维制约;二、有助于提升司法活动参与者自身的修辞认知和实践能力,促进司法审判的良性运行。法律修辞的特性主要有:修辞背景上的强制说理性;修辞权限上的日趋独立性;修辞目的上的有限多元性。
Legal rhetoric is a special rhetoric different from other rhetorical types such as moral rhetoric,literary rhetoric,and political rhetoric.However,because people pay insufficient attention to its particularity,there are a lot of practices of confusing legal rhetoric and other rhetorical types.From a judicial perspective,unlike Aristotle and Burke's rhetorical cognition,legal rhetoric refers to the rhetorical activities of the participants in the judicial activities that contribute to the realization of the legal effect,including speech and behavior.From the actual and expected perspective,the definition of the characteristics of legal rhetoric needs to follow two criteria:First,it helps correctly distinguish different types of rhetoric,and prevent other types of rhetoric from power alienation and thinking constraints;Second,it can improve the rhetorical cognition and practical ability of judicial participants and promote the sound operation of judicial trials.The characteristics of legal rhetoric mainly include compulsory rhetoric on its background,the increasing independence of rhetorical authority,and the limited diversity of rhetorical purpose.
作者
张西恒
ZHANG Xi-heng(Law School,Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai,201701,PRC)
出处
《西北师大学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第1期138-144,共7页
Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目"医患纠纷人民调解模式研究"(14AZD149)
关键词
法律修辞
释法说理
法治思维
司法修辞
legal rhetoric
interpretation of laws and reasons
idea of rule of law
judicial rhetoric
