期刊文献+

机械通气患儿行为状态评分量表的汉化及信效度分析 被引量:6

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of State Behavioral Scale for mechanically ventilated children
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 汉化机械通气患儿行为状态评分量表(SBS),分析其在儿童重症监护室(PICU)机械通气患儿镇静评估中的信效度。 方法 采用美国矫形外科医师学会循证医学委员会推荐的跨文化调适指南对SBS量表进行汉化,采取方便抽样法对172例PICU机械通气患儿进行镇静评估,并对量表进行信效度分析。 结果 中文版SBS总Cronbach α系数为0.986;量表条目内容效度指数为0.83-0.10,总的内容效度指数为0.932;中文版SBS与中文版舒适度量表的相关系数为0.919(P<0.01)。 结论 中文版SBS具有良好的信度和效度,适用于机械通气患儿的镇静评估。 Objective To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of State Behavioral Scale for Mechanically Ventilated Children (SBS). Methods The English version of SBS was revised and translated into Chinese version. The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SBS was tested in 172 mechanically ventilated children. Results The Cronbach α coefficient of the Chinese SBS was 0.986. The item-level content validity index of Chinese SBS were 0.83-0.10, and the scale-level content validity index of Chinese SBS was 0.932. The correlation coefficient between the score of Chinese SBS and the Comfort Scale (CS) was 0.919 (P<0.01). Conclusions The Chinese version of SBS has been proved to be reliable and valid.It can be used to sedation assessment for mechanically ventilated children.
作者 杨巾夏 姚文英 王新 柏振江 Yang Jinxia;Yao Wenying;Wang Xin;Bai Zhenjiang(Nursing Departrsent of Children's Hospital of Sooehow University,Suzhou 2150258,China;PICU of Children 's Hospital of Soochow University,Suzhou 2150258,China)
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 2019年第2期114-118,共5页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
基金 2017年苏州市民生科技项目(SYSD2017097).
关键词 行为状态评估 机械通气 信度 效度 State behavioral scale Mechanical ventilation Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献52

  • 1Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518. 被引量:1
  • 2Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135. 被引量:1
  • 3Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575. 被引量:1
  • 4Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22. 被引量:1
  • 5Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293. 被引量:1
  • 6Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385. 被引量:1
  • 7Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197. 被引量:1
  • 8Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497. 被引量:1
  • 9Nora JJ.Causes old and new modes,mechanisms and models.Am Heart J,1993,125:1409 被引量:2
  • 10Hoffman JIE.Congenital heart disease:incidence and inheritance.Ped Clin North Am,1990,37:25 被引量:2

共引文献1109

同被引文献55

引证文献6

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部