期刊文献+

欧洲人权法在欧盟民事司法合作中的适用:扩张与协调——以判决承认与执行中审查程序的取消为中心 被引量:4

Application of European Human Rights Law in EU Civil Judicial Cooperation:Expansion and Coordination
原文传递
导出
摘要 欧盟在民事司法合作中取消审查程序的立法改革,有助于促进判决的自由流动和欧洲一体化建设。鉴于传统的公共政策机制并不能妥善解决判决债务人的人权保护问题,欧洲人权法扩张适用于欧盟民事司法合作问题的主张,应予肯定。在欧洲人权法介入的情况下,基于其与欧盟国际私法之间可能产生的冲突,应协调欧洲人权法在欧盟民事司法合作领域的适用。欧盟国际私法与欧洲人权法并不存在根本矛盾,两者相互促进,并服务于将欧盟建成一个"自由、安全和正义的区域"之目标。 Abolition of exequatur in EU civil judicial cooperation is helpful to promote the free movement of the judgments and the construction of the European integration.As public policy mechanism cannot properly protect the debtors’ human rights,the extended application of European human rights law should be affirmed.As the conflict may arise between EU private international law and European human rights law,the application of European human rights law should be coordinated.There is no fundamental contradiction between EU private international law and the European human rights law,both of which serve to build EU as an area of freedom,security and justice.
作者 黄志慧
出处 《法学评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期152-162,共11页 Law Review
基金 国家社科基金青年项目"<欧洲人权公约>在国际私法中的适用问题研究"(项目编号:16CFX067)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 欧盟民事司法合作 欧洲人权法 判决的承认与执行 审查程序的取消 相互信任原则 EU Civil Judicial Cooperation European Human Rights Law Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments Abolition of Exequatur Principle of Mutual Trust
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献64

  • 1郭树理.回顾与展望:世纪之交的欧盟统一国际私法运动[J].中国国际私法与比较法年刊,2002,5(1):22-37. 被引量:1
  • 2杜志华.欧盟统一国际私法的最新发展——《婚姻事项管辖权及判决的承认与执行公约》简析[J].法学评论,2001,19(6):80-86. 被引量:5
  • 3See G. Weiek, Human Rights and Private International Law, in J. MaeEldowney G. Weick (eds.), Human Rights in Transition, Frankfurt am Main, 2003, pp. 193--200. 被引量:1
  • 4Article 39 of Regulation < EU >No.1215 /2012 of the European Par- liament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters < Recast>. 被引量:1
  • 5Jan--Jaap Kuipers, The Right to a Fair Trial and the Free Movement of Civil Judgments, 6 Croatian Yearbook of Eu- ropean Law & Policy 32 (2010). 被引量:1
  • 6See Horatia Muir Watt, Fundamental Rights and Recognition in Private International Law, 13 European Journal of Human Rights 411--435 (2013). 被引量:1
  • 7Dean Spielmann, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judicial Decisions Requirements Under the European Convention on Human Rights: An Overview, 1 Cyprus Human Rights Law Review 4--24 (2012). 被引量:1
  • 8See Trevor C. Hartley, The European Union and the Systematic Dismantling of the Common Law of Conflict of Laws, 54 Int'l & Comp. L. Q. 813, 813-821 (2005). 被引量:1
  • 9Ralf Miehaels, The New European Choice--of--Law Revolution, 82 Tul. L. Rev. 1607 (2008). 被引量:1
  • 10B. Hess, T. Pfeiffer & P. Schlosser, Report on the Application of Regulation Brussels I in the Member States (Study JLS/C4/2005/03 Heidelberg Report), para. 559. 被引量:1

共引文献17

同被引文献16

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部