摘要
美国学界自20世纪中后期起对陪审团事实认知机制进行了大量的实证研究,并提出了诸多陪审团事实认知理论模型。美国陪审团事实认知机制与陪审团制度、审判中心模式以及对抗制息息相关,这些因素共同构成陪审团事实认知机制的制度基础。美国学界对陪审团事实认知机制研究的关注与社会对陪审团的不信任、陪审团改革等有关。美国陪审团事实认知机制研究也促进美国陪审团制度的改革,使美国陪审团改革尽可能地沿着科学化路径进行,尽可能地避免改革的恣意并防范权力对陪审团民主价值的过分侵犯。
Lots of empirical research on the system how juries know facts have been made by academic scholars in USA from the middle of 20 th centuries,and several theoretical models of jury decision making have been introduced. The system how juries process facts has a very close relationship with jury system and the model of trial centralism and adversary system,which are the systematic foundation of the system how juries process facts. The reasons why American academic scholars pay much attention to this topic are people distrusted the jury and reforms of jury system happened. Such research promotes the reform of jury system in America,and supplies scientific methods for jury reforms,and prevents reckless jury reforms and severe infringement on the democratic value of jury.
出处
《比较法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第6期152-168,共17页
Journal of Comparative Law
基金
教育部2017年度人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“刑事陪审员事实认知方式研究:以认知心理学为视角”(17YJC820010)
天津市2017年度哲学社会科学规划基金一般项目“人民法院司法责任改革实证研究”(TJFX17-002)的研究成果
