摘要
以上海自贸区设置的相关政策和管理办法为分析对象,通过对政策的归类分析,并与基隆自由港区、釜山自贸区的比较,认为上海自贸区在金融、服务、贸易以及政府管理方面的政策特点较为突出,与基隆和釜山自贸区相比,上海自贸区在自由度和便利化方面水平较高。但是,上海自贸区缺乏全国性立法的法律保障以及领导机构,需要尽快加强,以便于自贸区模式推广。另外,上海自贸区承担的功能较多,可能会引发区内产业竞争有限资源,需要政府做好协调工作,确保重点产业发展。
In this article, relative policies and management practices for Shanghai Free Trade Zone （FTZ） were analyzed, classified and compared with the other two free ports： Keelung and Busan F＇YZ. Results indicate that Shanghai FTZ features in the financial services, trade and gov- ernment management. Compared with Keelung and Busan, Shanghai FTZ enjoys more freedom and facilitation in higher level. However, Shanghai Free Trade Zone lacks of legal protection and governing bodies of legislation in national level and thus needs to be strengthened as soon as possible in order to promote the free trade zone mode. In addition, the Shanghai FTZ bears too many functions and is likely to lead to regional industry competition for the limited resources. The government, therefore, is well needed to coordinate the work in the zone and to ensure the development of key industries.
出处
《当代经济管理》
CSSCI
2014年第9期42-47,共6页
Contemporary Economic Management
关键词
自贸区
政策
上海
比较分析
FTZ
policy
Shanghai
comparative analysis
