期刊文献+

气压弹道碎石术与钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石的比较 被引量:342

A comparative study of pneumatic lithotripsy and holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral stones
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较经输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术与钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效和安全性。 方法 总结应用输尿管镜技术治疗 2 85例输尿管结石患者的临床资料 ,其中气压弹道碎石术145例 ,钬激光碎石术 140例。 结果 钬激光碎石术单次手术碎石率为 95 .7% ,高于气压弹道碎石术的 6 9.7% ,P <0 .0 1;钬激光碎石术平均结石排净时间为 18d ,短于气压弹道碎石术的 31d ,P <0 .0 1;钬激光碎石组无明显并发症发生 ,气压弹道碎石组有 5例发生穿孔。 结论 钬激光碎石术的有效率和安全性优于气压弹道碎石术。钬激光碎石术是治疗输尿管结石的一种安全。 Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic pnumatic lithotripsy (PL) and endoscopic laser lithotripsy (LL) for ureteral stones. Methods From Aug.1994 to Feb.2000,285 consecutive patients underwent endoscopic lithotripsy either with the Swiss Lithoclast pneumatic lithotripter (145 cases) or with Ho:YAG laser lithotripter (140 cases) for the treatment of ureteral stones. Results The single session overall successful rate of stone fragmentation of LL was higher than that of PL (95.7% vs,69.7%, P <0.01).The average stonefree time was shorter for LL (18 days vs.31 days, P <0.01).No major complication has been observed in LL whereas 5 perforations were encountered in PL. Conclusions LL has its advantage over PL in high efficiency of stone fragmentation and low complication rate and is an effective and safe treatment modality for ureteral stones.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2001年第3期145-147,共3页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 输尿管结石 内窥镜术 碎石术 治疗 气压弹道碎石术 钬激光碎石术 Ureteral stone Endoscopy Lithotripsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

同被引文献1232

引证文献342

二级引证文献1568

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部