摘要
本文对元代文献中"散州"的含义进行澄清,认为元代"散州"为州之泛称,既是区别于宋金时按"节度体系"划分等第之州而言的,也是相对于元代路总管府而言的。并对元、清两代内涵一致的"散州",即元代"路或散府下辖不领县之属州"进行系统梳理,归纳出江北、江南及西南之云南行省这三个区域散州由来的三种不同路径并分析其缘由;在此基础上复原出至顺元年散州的布局,最后得出元代散州的分布差异在一定程度上反映出全国各地开发进程的不一和户口的悬殊。
This paper clarified the meaning of the Yuan Dynasty＇ ＂SanZhou＂ , which is not only different from the Song and Jin Dynasties＇ ＂Jiedu system Zhou ＂, hut also relative to the Yuan Dynas- ty＇ ＂Luzongguanfu＂. And this paper teased out the connotation consistent ＂SanZhou＂ of the Yuan and Qing generations, namely the ＂Lu＂ or ＂Sanfu＂ contains ＂Zhou＂ which does not administrate counties systematically. The author summarized the origin of＂SanZhou＂about three different paths of the three regions：the Jiangnan.Jiangbei and Yunnan province of the southwest region,and analyzed its reason. On this basis, the author recovered the distribution of San Zhou of the first year of Zhishun. Finally the author obtained the layout of ＂SanZhou＂, to a certain extent reflected the early or late of the de- velopment process and household＇ disparity throughout the country.
出处
《中国历史地理论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第2期68-80,共13页
Journal of Chinese Historical Geography
关键词
元代散州
由来
县升州
省并州县
布局
Yuan Dynasty＇ ＂SanZhou＂
origin
from county to Zhou
merge the Zhou and counties
layout
