期刊文献+

我国水库大坝风险评价与决策研究 被引量:15

Dam risk evaluation and decision- making research of China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对水库大坝风险进行了分类和分区,分析了成文法和不成文法两类不同法律体系下的风险标准特点,提出将我国大坝风险分为可接受风险、可容忍风险、不可接受风险和极高风险4个区域。在基于风险评价一般原则基础上,分析了ALARP原则在不成文法国家及我国的内涵,阐述了成本效益法和失衡法在ALARP原则中的作用及使用方法,提出了水库大坝风险决策原则,为我国水库大坝风险标准的制定提供了理论依据。 The classification and subregion of reservoir dam risk degree have been given in the study. By analyzing the features of the risk criteria in the civil code of law and the common law systems, it is suggested that the domestic dam risks can be classified into four regions: acceptable risk, tolerable risk, unacceptable risk and extremely high risk. Based on general principles of the risk evaluation, the implications of ALARP principle both in the countries with the common law and in our country are analyzed, and effects and applications of cost effectiveness method and disproportionality ratio method in ALARP principle are stated in this paper. Finally, the principles of dam risk decision-making are establised on a scientific analysis base, which will provide a sound theoretical basis for further research on dam risk and the formulation of dam risk criteria in China.
出处 《水利水运工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期49-54,共6页 Hydro-Science and Engineering
基金 十一五国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAC14B07) 水利部公益性行业科研专项经费项目(201201051)
关键词 大坝风险 风险分类和分区 风险评价 ALARP原则 风险决策 dam risk risk classification and subregion risk evaluation ALARP principle risk decision-making
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1《中国水利年鉴》编纂委员会.中国水利年鉴2010[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2010:436-438. 被引量:2
  • 2佘建星.工程项目风险管理[M].天津:天津大学出版社,2006. 被引量:1
  • 3ANCOLD(Australian National Committee on Large Dams). Guidelines on risk assessment[ R]. Sydney: ANCOLD, 2003. 被引量:1
  • 4ICOLD (International Commission on Large Dams). Risk assessment in dam safety management[ R]. ICOLD bulletin 130, ICOLD, 2005. 被引量:1
  • 5HSE (Health and Safety Executive, United Kingdom). Reducing risks, protecting people[ R]. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 2001. 被引量:1
  • 6BOWLES D S. Tolerable risk for dams: How safe is safe enough? [ C] JJProceedings of USSD( United States Society on Dams) 27th Annual Conference. Philadelphia, PA(US), 2007. 被引量:1
  • 7吴德春.大陆法系和英美法系的比较研究[J].华人时刊,2013(8):145. 被引量:1
  • 8ALE B J M. Tolerable or acceptable: A comparison of risk regulation in the United Kingdom and in the Netherlands [ J ]. Risk Analysis, 2005, 25(2) : 231-241. 被引量:1
  • 9MORGAN M G, HENRION M. Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis Cambridge[ M]. New York : Cambridge University Press, 1990. 被引量:1
  • 10BOWLES D S. ALARP evaluation: using effectiveness and disproportionality to justify risk reduction [ C ]//ANCOLD 2003 Conference on Dams. 2003: 1-17. 被引量:1

共引文献1

同被引文献109

引证文献15

二级引证文献110

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部