摘要
目的 检验社交回避与苦恼量表中文版在少数民族大学生中的信度和效度.方法 采用社交回避与苦恼量表、安全感量表、整体自尊量表和青少年生活满意度量表对399名蒙古族大学生进行测量.结果 ①社交回避与苦恼量表内部一致性信度0.872,回避分量表信度为0.726,苦恼分量表为0.742,总量表的重测信度为0.86,回避分量表为0.789,苦恼分量表为0.814;②结构方程模型拟合指数x2/df=4.864、NFI=0.92、TLI=0.90、GFI=0.90、IFI=0.87、GFI=0.92、A GFI=0.93、RMSEA=0.06,模型拟合较好;③社交回避分量表与社交苦恼显著正相关（r=0.634,P＜0.01）,与SES、SQ和AULC显著负相关（r=-0.202～-0.499,均P＜0.01）;社交苦恼分量表与安全感量表、整体自尊量表和青少年生活满意度量表显著负相关（r=-0.192～-0.556,均P＜0.01）.结论 社交回避与苦恼量表中文版在蒙古族大学生中的信效度较好.
Objective To evaluate the validity and reliability of social avoidance and distress scale （SAD） for conforming it＇ s applicability in Mongolian college students.Methods Social avoidance and distress scale （SAD）security scale （SQ）,self-esteem scale （SES） and life satisfaction scale （AULC） was used to measure 399 undergraduates whose can understand Mongolian and Chinese language.Results The total scale reliability was 0.872,avoidance scale was 0.726,distress scale was 0.742,total scale heavy reliability （r） was 0.86,avoidance scale （r） was 0.789,distress scale （r） was 0.814.（2）the confirmatory factor analysis verified the effectiveness of the structure,the revised model fitting index x2/df=4.864,NFI =0.92,TLI =0.90,GFI =0.90,IFI =0.87,GFI =0.92,AGFI =0.93,RMSEA =0.06,model fitting was better.（3） There was a significant positive correlation between avoidance scale and distress scale （r=0.634,P〈0.01）,and there was a negative correlation （r=0.202-0.499,P〈0.01） between avoidance scale and SES,SQ and AULC.There was a negative correlation between distress scale and SES,SQ and AULC （r=0.192-0.556,P〈0.01）.Conclusion SAD （Chinese version） has a good reliability and validity in Mongolian college students.
出处
《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2014年第6期563-565,共3页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
关键词
社交回避与苦恼
蒙古族
信度
效度
心理测量
Social avoidance and distress scale
Mongolian
Reliability
Validity
Psychological measurement
