期刊文献+

制造能力沙堆模型实证研究:创新要素的重新定位

Empirical Study on the Manufacturing Capability Sandcone Model: The Reposition of Innovation Elements
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在创新能力成为企业核心能力的背景下,将创新要素作为终极制造能力要素的沙堆模型不再符合现代企业的运营现状,本文将制造能力沙堆模型中创新要素的位置进行了调整,并采用IMSS2009数据库对调整后的沙堆模型进行了实证分析.实证结果表明,制造能力要素间的累积效应普遍存在,创新要素可以为其他要素的提升提供支持,制造能力提升的最佳次序是:"质量→交付→创新→柔性→成本".此外,从学习的视角来解释制造能力要素间的累积效应,并讨论了不同战略选择下的企业制造能力提升路径.本研究对传统的沙堆模型进行了拓展,拓展后的沙堆模型更能发挥创新要素与其他制造能力要素之间的协同作用,更符合现代企业的运营,对制造企业管理者具有重要的借鉴意义. Innovation has become the core eompetence of manufacturers, so the traditional manufacturing capability model regard innovation as an ultimate manufacturing capability deviates the situation of modern enterprises. It repositioned innovation element in the manufacturing capability Sandcone model, based on the IMSS 2009 database, and conducted an empirical study on the innovation element repositioned Sandcone model. Results show that the cumulative effect is common among manufacturing capability elements, and innovation element could support the improvement of other manufacturing capability elements. The best sequence of improving manufaeturing capability should be : Manutacturers should firstly focus on quality and delivery, then on innovation and flexibility, and lastly on cost. In addition, it explained the cumulative effect from the learning perspective, and also discussed different improving path based on the strategy, choice. It extended the traditional manufacturing capability Sandcone model, and provided reference for manufacturing practitioners aiming at improving manufacturing eapability.
出处 《研究与发展管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期104-114,共11页 R&D Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目"基于企业资源理论的制造能力模型及内部作用机理"(70872026) "面向服务型制造的企业服务与制造能力共生模式及资源配置"(71002060) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20102302110058)
关键词 沙堆模型 创新要素 制造能力 sandcone model innovation eletnent manufacturing capability
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1Gr(o)Bler A,Grübner A.An empirical model of the relationships between manufacturing capabilities[J].International Journal of Operations & Production Management,2006,26 (5):458-485. 被引量:1
  • 2Ferdows K,De Meyer A.Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance:In search of a new theory[J].Journal of Operations Management,1990,9 (2):168-184. 被引量:1
  • 3Flynn B B,Flynn E J.An exploratory study of the nature of cumulative capabilities[J].Journal of Operations Management,2004,22 (5):439-457. 被引量:1
  • 4Hallgren M,Olhager J,Schroeder R G.A hybrid model of competitive capabilities[J].International Journal of Operations & Production Management,2011,31 (5):511-526. 被引量:1
  • 5Avella L,Vazquez-Bustelo D,Fernandez E.Cumulative manufacturing capabilities:An extended model and new empirical evidence[J].International Journal of Production Research,2011,49 (3):707-729. 被引量:1
  • 6Schroeder R G,Shah R,Peng D X.The cumulative capability ‘ sand cone' model revisited:A new perspective for manufacturing strategy[J].International Journal of Production Research,2011,49(16):4879-4901. 被引量:1
  • 7Leong G K,Snyder D L,Ward P T.Research in the process and content of manufacturing strategy[J].Omega,1990,18(2):109-122. 被引量:1
  • 8Noble M A.Manufacturing strategy:Testing the cumulative model in a multiple country context[J].Decision Sciences,1995,26 (5):693-721. 被引量:1
  • 9Noble M A.Manufacturing competitive priorities and productivity:An empirical study[J].International Journal of Operations & Production Management,1997,17 (1/2):85-99. 被引量:1
  • 10Safizadeh M H,Ritzman L P,Mallick D.Revisiting alternative theoretical paradigms in manufacturing strategy[J].Production and Operations Management,2000,9 (2):111-127. 被引量:1

二级参考文献30

  • 1[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246 被引量:1
  • 5[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353 被引量:1
  • 7[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162 被引量:1
  • 8[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993 被引量:1
  • 9[9]Hu L, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3: 424~ 453 被引量:1
  • 10[10]Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1~ 55 被引量:1

共引文献1264

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部