期刊文献+

构式语法中动词与构式的整合

Integration of Verb and Construction in Construction Grammar
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Goldberg在构式语法中论述了动词与构式的整合过程就是动词参与者角色与构式论元角色之间的融合,具有相同参与者角色和角色侧重的动词必定能与相同的构式相融合。但事实上,虽然具有相同参与者角色和角色侧重的动词load和throw能同时与使动构式相融合,load却还能与带with短语的因果构式相融合,而throw不能。在探讨了造成整合观存在缺陷的根源后,本文提出了对整合观的改良方法,即赋予动词不同的角色侧重,从而解决了load和throw参与者角色相同却不能出现在相同构式的问题。 Goldberg claims that the integration of verb and construction is the fusion of verb's participant roles and construction's argument roles and that verbs which possess the same participant roles and role profile can definitely fuse with the same construction. However, the linguistic facts demonstrate the deficiency of her claim. For instance, load and throw possess the same participant roles and role profile. Load can fuse with caused-motion construction as well as cansative- plus-with-adjunct while throw only can fuse with caused-motion construction. Based on the analysis of reasons of her integration view deficiency, the article proposes the refined approach, that is, to attach different participant role profiles to the same verb. This refined approach successfully solves the problem why load and throw which possess the same partici- pant roles and role profile fuse with different constructions.
作者 符存 赵静宜
出处 《英语研究》 2014年第1期10-13,共4页 English Studies
关键词 动词 构式 整合 缺陷 改良 verb construction integration deficiency refinement
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献21

  • 1董燕萍,梁君英.走近构式语法[J].现代外语,2002,25(2):142-152. 被引量:175
  • 2王黎.关于构式和词语的多功能性[J].外国语,2005,28(4):2-5. 被引量:41
  • 3袁野.语篇理解的体验观:认知心理学的新阐释[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2007,30(1):10-14. 被引量:5
  • 4Gibbs, R. Embodied experience and linguistic meaning[J]. Brain and Language, 2003,84 : 1-15. 被引量:1
  • 5Glenberg, A.& Robertson, D. Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2000(43) :379-401. 被引量:1
  • 6Goldberg, A. Constructions:A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995. 被引量:1
  • 7Goldberg, A. The relationships between verbs and constructions [A]. In M. Verspoor(eds. ). Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning[C]. John Benjamins Publishing Co, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 8Goldberg. A. Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations[J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 2002,13 (4) : 327-356. 被引量:1
  • 9Iwata, S. The role of verb meaning in locative alternations[A]. In M. Fried(eds. ). Grammatical Constructions: Back to the roots [C]. John Benjamins Publishing Co,2005. 被引量:1
  • 10Johnson, M, The Body in the Mind:The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1987. 被引量:1

共引文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部