摘要
文学史的叙述方式通常按照流派来纳入到文学史的整体叙述和阐释框架中,师陀的文学史定位一直引发研究者的争议和关注,左翼评论家与京派评论家都拒绝将其纳为本流派作家。通过对师陀在文学创作中的主题、风格、技巧等方面的分析,揭示师陀的作品具有主动疏离文坛文学流派地倾向,并细读师陀乡土小说主题等相似的文学作品,发现师陀的文学作品具有与他人完全不一样地艺术特色和内在意蕴,具有"奇特的风格",从而呈现其文学史定位的异质性。
Narration form of history of literature is generally included into overall narration and interpretation framework according to school.Shi Tuo ’ s orientation of history of literature has always triggered dispute and attention from researches.Both left -wing critics and Beijing -school critics reject including it into writers of this school.Through analysis of Shi Tuo ’ s theme, style and technique in literary creation , It reveals that the works of Shi Tuo have a tendency to initiatively be alienated from schools of literature of the literary world .And through reading Shi Tuo ’ s literary works similar to subjects such as local novels in details , it founds that his literary works have artistic characteristics and inherent connotation that are completely different from others and possess “peculiar style”, thus presenting heterogeneity of Shi Tuo ’ s literary history positioning.
出处
《宜春学院学报》
2014年第5期89-92,共4页
Journal of Yichun University
关键词
师陀
文学史
定位
异质性
Shi Tuo
history of literature
orientation
heterogeneity
