期刊文献+

团体心理干预对初中生校园暴力行为的影响

Effect of group psychological intervention on school violence in junior high school students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 了解某市中学生校园暴力发生现状及其影响因素,采用以团体心理辅导和健康教育为主方式进行综合干预,并评估干预效果.方法 采用前瞻性干预研究设计,按年级分层,随机抽取班级,将受调查615名学生分成研究组(n =295)和对照组(n=320).研究组学生将接受为期8次的心理干预,而对照组不采取任何干预.所有被试学生干预前、后自评完成一般情况调查问卷、校园暴力行为调查问卷和特质应对方式问卷(TCSQ).2个月后评价团体心理干预的效果.结果 615名学生校园暴力行为检出率为35.3%.其中男生为43.0%,女生为25.9%,差异有统计学意义(χ^2 =19.570,P< 0.01).多因素Logistic回归分析表明男生、经常被父母打骂、经常玩网络游戏、消极应对是校园暴力行为的危险因素.男生校园暴力的危险性高于女生(OR=0.321,P<0.01);经常被父母打骂(OR=1.562,P<0.01)、经常玩网络游戏(OR=2.393,P<0.01)校园暴力的危险性相对较高;消极应对水平高者(OR=2.931,P<0.05)校园暴力的危险性相对较高.干预后暴力行为的检出率对照组高于研究组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^2=4.553,P<0.05).干预后,研究组消极应对分较干预前显著降低,差异有统计学意义(Z=6.743,P<0.01).结论 团体心理辅导能够有效降低校园暴力的发生,可有效改善学生的应对方式. Objective To study the prevalence of school violence among middle school students, and to identify the effective factors and to provide the group guidance to prevent school violence. Methods Group psychological intervention study was used, 615 junior high school students were recruted, 2 classes were chosen randomly from every grade, one acted as the experiment group, the other as the control group. A 4--months group guidance was given to the study group students but not to the control students. All subjects were assessed with General questionnaire, School violence questionnaire and Trait Copping Style Questionnaire (TCSQ). The difference of these parameters between the experi- ment group and the control group was compared two months later after intervention and the effect of the intervention was appraised. Results In the 615 junior high school students interviewed, the rate of school violence was 35.3%, of which the involvement of schoolboys was 43.0% and schoolgirls was 25.9%. Multiple logistic analysis indicated that in schoolboys (OR : 0. 321 ,P〈 0.01), frequent beatings by parents (OR = 1. 562,P〈 0.01), often playing online games (OR : 2. 393,P〈 0.01) and nega- tive coping style (OR = 2. 931,P〈 0.05) were the risk factors of school violence. After the interven- tion, the rate of school violence from the experiment group was lower than that of the control group, and the difference was significant (X2 = 4. 553,P〈 0.05). In study group, compared to the baseline the scores of negative coping style of TCSQ decreased significantly (Z = 6. 743,P〈 0.01). No significant changes were found in the control group. Conclusions School violence among junior high school students was serious. The group intervention was effective to decrease the rate of school violence, and also helpful in improving students' coping styles.
出处 《神经疾病与精神卫生》 2014年第2期154-156,共3页 Journal of Neuroscience and Mental Health
基金 济宁市科技发展计划项目(2011)
关键词 校园暴力 团体心理干预 危险因素 初中生 School violence Group psychological intervention Risk factors Junior highschool students
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献129

共引文献3052

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部