摘要
实施保险诈骗行为的主体与《刑法》规定的保险诈骗罪的实行犯主体不一致时,不能一概否认其构成保险诈骗罪,如果相关活动已形成商业惯例,或者保险公司知情并且同意,行为人仍可构成保险诈骗罪。《刑法》第198条第4款关于本罪共犯范围的规定只是提示性条款。本罪未遂形态的判定,应采用实质客观说的观点。而对本罪罪数形态的判断,应根据《刑法》条文的不同规定以及牵连犯的处罚原则综合判定。
When people who implement the insurance fraud and the ＂ Criminal Law＂ provisions inconsistent with the crime of in- surance fraud, should not be any denying constitute insurance fraud. If the activities already formed business practices, or the insur- ance company informed and consent, the perpetrator still constitute insurance fraud. ＂ Criminal Law＂ Article 198, paragraph 4, the scope of the relevant provisions of complicity in this crime is only indicative terms. Determination of the attempted crime, should adopt the ＂substantial objective＂ point of view. We should implicated punishment principle to determine the attempted crime based on ＂crim- inal law＂ provisions of the different requirements.
出处
《华北水利水电学院学报（社会科学版）》
2014年第2期93-96,共4页
Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
保险诈骗
主体范围
未遂形态
罪数形态
insurance fraud
subject scope
attempted offense
crime number form
